hi *, Am Friday 16 March 2007 schrieb Thorsten Ziehm: > Hi Andre, > > to start with the oldest one, could be really a waste of time. > Because I think, most of the older issues were looked more than > once by a QA member. And most of them ddidn't know, what to do > with it. So they let them untouched. I would suggest to start > with the current ones. Yes
> It is important to check all issues, if they are valid or not. If > there are 1000 issues, where nobody take a look. We do not know, > if there are important issues in it. The past show that most of > these issues are not critical, but when nobody does this work, we > will never know. ? > Do you have any other suggestion, what to do with the > 'unconfirmed' defects? To ignore them in the future cannot be a > goal, or? Keep the newest 20%, ask the owners of the rest what to do, because they know it and can assess the importance (they have a newer release, more kwowledge about ooo, more patience :-) then during writing the issue, more working expierience. Encourage to delete old issues, give the right to do so. Have done this with big success (list shorten to about 40%), making users and developers more satisfied and in a short time the product more perfect. > And yes it is something for the OOo statistics as well. Shure :-)) <> Regards Wolfgang --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
