Okay, understood.

On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Robbie Gemmell wrote:

Sorry if I wasn't clear. I wasn't saying it shouldn't go in, quite the
opposite; in general I wouldn't allow this kind of change at this point, but
in this particular case it is actually putting something back roughly the
way it was until changed a few days ago so I would actually say that it must
be put in.

Robbie

-----Original Message-----
From: Justin Ross [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 08 March 2011 20:34
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request for the following commits to be included in 0.10

Hi, Robbie.  I appreciate your caution regarding item 4, and I'm prepared to
revert that change if it's not truly low risk.

Anyone else have an opinion on this item?

On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Robbie Gemmell wrote:

4. This specific change looks good to restore the prior behaviour,
though in general I wouldn't consider work around change of accept
mode to be very low risk. I would suggest there should have been tests
added to verify the behaviour of the original change that caused the
issue though (same goes for all really).

Robbie

-----Original Message-----
From: Justin Ross [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 08 March 2011 18:08
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Request for the following commits to be included in 0.10

Hi, Rajith.  I approved item 4.

Robbie, would you indicate briefly up or down for 0.10 in the comments
of
qpid-3109 and -2732?

Justin

On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Rajith Attapattu wrote:

Hi Justin,

I'd like the following commits to be included in the 0.10 release branch.

1. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1078961&view=rev  - QPID-3109  -
Fairly low risk.
 This is a simple bug fix.

2. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1078971&view=rev - QPID-2732  -
Low risk.
 This is an addition to the initial commit made under this JIRA.
  It adds default reliability modes and throws an exception for an
unsupported combination.

3. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1079408&view=rev - QPID-2732  -
Low
Risk
   The reliability mode is used to mark a transfer unreliable and
that flag is used to determine if a transfer should be stored for
replay or
not.
   Again a fairly straightforward and low risk commit. However I have
asked Rafi to have a quick look at it as well.

4. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1079402&view=rev - QPID-3127 -
Very low risk.
    Fixes a bug in the initial commit for QPID-2732.
    It just sets accept mode to NONE for NO_ACKNOWLEDGE.

Regards,

Rajith


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to