On 9 Mar 2011, at 00:40, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Sorry if I wasn't clear. I wasn't saying it shouldn't go in, quite
the
opposite; in general I wouldn't allow this kind of change at this
point, but
in this particular case it is actually putting something back
roughly the
way it was until changed a few days ago so I would actually say
that it must
be put in.
+1 on including #4 in 0.10
When we discovered and fixed this, we weren't actually aware it was a
regression introduced recently, hence the separate JIRA and careful
testing.
Andrew.
--
-- andrew d kennedy ? do not fold, bend, spindle, or mutilate ;
-- http://grkvlt.blogspot.com/ ? edinburgh : +44 7582 293 255 ;
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
