[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QUARKS-48?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15227233#comment-15227233
]
Dale LaBossiere commented on QUARKS-48:
---------------------------------------
Not sure if this is the right jira for this...
I recently copied an existing pattern for referencing javadoc from a recipe
(recipe_value_out_of_range.md) and my link is broken.
That pattern is using quarks-edge.github.io - e.g.,
http://quarks-edge.github.io/quarks/docs/javadoc/quarks/topology/TStream.html
The link that I specified is for a relatively new class
(quarks.analytics.sensors.Range) and isn't present in the javadoc exposed by
quarks-edge.github.io. I guess makes a some sense because I assume it's the
javadoc for the current state of the (~abandoned) quarks-edge site.
I get the feeling that I should just leave my broken link as is for now?
Will this Jira will include going through the incubator-quarks-website content
and cleaning up all of the quarks-edge urls floating around?
Can/should anything be done in the meantime so the recipes' javadoc links are
accurate - e.g., (cough) putting the current quarks javadoc on
quarks-edge.github.io? :-)
> Generate JavaDoc for website
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: QUARKS-48
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QUARKS-48
> Project: Quarks
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Documentation
> Reporter: Cazen Lee
>
> I'm not sure but it seems that Javadoc branch does not exist.
> I think we can make JavaDoc branch like below:
> https://github.com/quarks-edge/quarks/tree/gh-pages
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
