Hi Carlos, I think you missed my point and main question. The question is: Does MDL and Bootstrap support IE? If so, then they have found a way to customize Button. Seems like we should be able to do the same, but maybe it won't be the Jewel theme. It might be something else, maybe folks who need IE should just use our MDL support.
The point is that IE probably has MS support through 2025. It will likely fade to insignificant numbers among folks who get to choose which browser they want to use. But IE is likely going to live on through 2025 as a "terminal" for enterprise mission critical applications. Otherwise, I think MS would have already announced a true phase out of IE. IMO, Royale cannot ignore the "terminal" apps. That is where Flex was winning back in the Adobe days. Getting a big enterprise Adobe Flex customer who still has a Flex app to use Royale in IE would be a huge win for Royale. But again, it doesn't have to be Jewel. But it might be nice if it looked better than just Basic components. My 2 cents, -Alex On 4/7/18, 9:47 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: >Hi Alex, > >I think is better to show you IE11 rendering  > >I think the image is self explanatory. I didn't analyze it already, maybe >is some huge problem that makes it totally broken, but if not, if I need >to >have a complete rendering only for IE11 for each control and component we >have, I think simply doesn't worth it. > >I don't want to give up with this already, maybe we can find some easy way >to deal with this, but I want to comment it here so we can have it in >mind. > >Depending of the effort implied, other variables to have in mind is the >scope of this browser over time. We have deprecated already IE8, IE9 and >IE10, one for year (more or less). If things makes IE11 be almost in no >use >in a year, spend lots of time to get that concrete version of IE working >will be a huge waste of time. > >Let's analyze more the situation and I'm sure the right way to proceed >will >emerge in some days... > >Thanks > > > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsnag.gy%2 >FdOgomt.jpg&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C713cce522f334b96532208d59c >a75127%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636587164837567932&sda >ta=STfpIPB8inXDym12jvGyOPXzFMMvGFCjdG7I2eMR7Y0%3D&reserved=0 > >2018-04-07 17:10 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > >> IMO, we need Royale to work on IE11. It does not mean that Jewel must >> work on IE11, but it would be nice if some theme did, other than Basic. >> >> It turns out that my colleagues can't be sure of their data since IE was >> mostly being used for intranet apps in large enterprises, but I think IE >> is being kept around for those large enterprises who are leveraging the >> "plug-in" capabilities of IE. And I believe that Royale can be >>attractive >> to those enterprises. >> >> There is a difference between browsers that folks use for browsing the >>web >> and the app that is used in a mission critical app for the front end. I >> think MS is saying to use Edge for the first case, but IE is going to be >> around for many more years for the second case. >> >> Does MDL and Bootstrap work on IE? If so, if you can spend a day >>figuring >> out why IE11 doesn't work and come up with a simpler variant that does >> work, I think that would benefit Royale. >> >> My 2 cents, >> -Alex >> >> On 4/7/18, 12:42 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos >>Rovira" >> <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >Hi, >> > >> >since I'm on Mac I was blind to Microsoft browsers. >> >I was testing mainly with Chrome (since is the most used) and Safari >> >(since >> >is what I use to use). >> >I have installed Firefox, but I was not testing in a day by day basis. >> >Never used Opera and Yandex since I doesn't think as relevant >> > >> >For me Browserstack is mostly to test IE11 and Edge, and I found that >> >while >> >Edge has some issues (and Firefox too), both can be fixed for Jewel >> > >> >But the surprise was IE11.... this browser is not even near of what it >> >should show, so taking into account that IE is facing its extinction I >> >don't think I should >> >put hours in make that browser work at all. For me IE is the piece of >> >software we should help to be death and buried, since if it's not >>capable >> >of rendering >> >just a simple button right without lots of hacks, don't want to imagine >> >what other horrors it deserve to us in this journey. >> > >> >It's clear that today IE11 has still an important demographic, but in a >> >year I expect to be cut in favor of Edge that is the MS bet for the >> >future. >> >For me it's not aceptable to need lots of work for only one browser (an >> >version), when users have Chrome, Firefox, Opera, Safari and Yandex and >> >even more >> > >> >To see what I refer I think you should take a test of JewelExample in >> >different browsers. All behaves more or less the same. I see some >>issues >> >in >> >Edge and Firefox >> >to fix, but if you see the example in IE11 you will literally cry... >> > >> >So what do you think? >> > >> >-- >> >Carlos Rovira >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2 >> >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% >> 7Cfb664630749a424f327708d5 >> >9c5b39e8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% >> 7C636586838017132240&s >> >data=cCyvy2Hde5H4Rrs%2F75vMKty9ZvMlJxeqi4LSRKkzRjU%3D&reserved=0 >> >> > > >-- >Carlos Rovira >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2 >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C713cce522f334b96532208d5 >9ca75127%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636587164837567932&s >data=7kFXlYiASUZ3S4u%2BOA4PCw1n2LHBFX5lc6NzdUKxqgA%3D&reserved=0