Hi Piotr,

I still doesn't have knowledge of the release process, but hope to be the
next release manager. In the meanwhile, I'm following things, and what I
think, (of course without know to much about the real process and
implications in this concrete project), is that we should do the same as
others do, and that means releasing from a concrete commit in the develop
branch, that should generate the needed branches to manage the release
process and develop should continue its own way. At some point, once
release is done, release branch is merged in develop and master.

At least that's how I see it. In other words, we should not be different in
methodology to what other hundreds or thousands of projects do and in this
field follow the manual.

Thanks

Carlos




El mié., 19 sept. 2018 a las 10:39, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> I think everything is messed up right now. Before I got your response I was
> in a state where I run:
>
> ant -f releasecandidate.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.4 -Drc=1 make_branches
>
> It pushes to the develop 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT
> It pushes release branch called 0.9.4 where there is 0.9.3-SNAPSHOT - Not
> sure why.
>
> I wanted to revert it, but lot's of people commit things to develop, so I
> have no idea how to do that right now.
> I think there should be some rules where during release process committing
> to develop is stopped.
>
> I have tried update.versions on develop:
>
>  ant -f releasecandidate.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.4 -Drc=1 update.versions
> and it asked me on the next version and I typed 0.9.5, but it changes only
> couple of files.
>
> I have no idea how to fix all of that right now.
>
>
>
> pon., 17 wrz 2018 o 18:07 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> napisał(a):
>
> > Last week, the develop branch was setup to release as 0.9.3 since the
> > prior release was 0.9.2.  The scripts and defaults are not set up to
> skip a
> > version so we discussed ways to skip a version.  It included:
> >
> > 1) Running "ant -f releasecandidate.xml update.versions"
> > 2) Using "ant -f releasecandidate.xml make_branches" twice.
> >
> > The first run would set the poms in the release branch to 0.9.3 and set
> > the develop branch to 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT.
> > The second run would set the poms in the release branch to 0.9.4 and set
> > the develop branch to 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT.
> >
> > The correct state of the branches before executing step 4 in
> >
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Release-Manager-Notes#release-steps
> > is that the develop branch is set to 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT, the release branch
> is
> > set to 0.9.4, and other version numbers are set to 0.9.4, such as
> > build.properties in royale-asjs.  That's what update.versions did.  I did
> > that a couple of days ago.
> >
> > So, to answer your questions:
> >
> > 1) No, there shouldn't be any extra Ant targets to run at this time other
> > than maybe running make_branches on some or all of the repos to get us to
> > the desired state.  I think I've taken care of everything that
> > make_branches doesn't take care of.  I did not try to get all of the
> Maven
> > pieces in the 3 repos ready because I thought I saw that royale-typedefs
> > was already ready so I didn't know where you were in the process.  Some
> of
> > the targets in releasecandidate.xml run lots of Maven commands which will
> > update the POMs.  Those targets also patch some other things that Maven
> > needs but were hard to make work via Maven.  Since updating the
> > Maven-related data could not be one simple Maven command, I chose to use
> > Ant to take the RM through all of the steps.   But Ant builds do not use
> > the POM (although I'm still thinking of teaching the compiler to read the
> > POMs) so we have other Ant targets that update things for the Ant build
> of
> > the framework.  This is normally done during the final "release" target
> > after voting is over, but because we are skipping a version, I had to run
> > it once a few days ago.
> >
> > 2)  IMO, the simplest thing to do is update the develop branch so it
> looks
> > like we released a 0.9.3 before creating the final release branch for
> > 0.9.4.  That is why I am suggesting running make_branches until you reach
> > that state.  I think I've already taken care of the Ant properties.
> >
> > When you think you've got the branches for all repos in this state, let
> me
> > know and I will spot check it.
> >
> > HTH,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/17/18, 2:06 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >     Still don't understand what you did at all. I did make_branches. This
> > is
> >     what happened so far:
> >
> >     1) feature/0.9.4 -> branch has been created which contains 0.9.3 in
> > poms
> >     2) develop has been updated to 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT
> >
> >     Q 1: Should I run on develop ant command which updating for me some
> > stuff ?
> >     - What ANT do ? Does it update pom or something else ?
> >     Q 2: Because we would like to jump to one version ahead - Should I
> run
> > that
> >     ANT on RC1 branch or should I update it manually ?
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >     Piotr
> >
> >
> >     pon., 17 wrz 2018 o 09:53 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > napisał(a):
> >
> >     > If you have run make_branches, then the branches should be showing
> > 0.9.4
> >     > and the develop branch should be using 0.9.5.
> >     >
> >     > I already ran and pushed update.versions.  The Ant build should be
> > using
> >     > 0.9.4.
> >     >
> >     > I'm stopping work for tonight.
> >     >
> >     > HTH,
> >     > -Alex
> >     >
> >     > On 9/17/18, 12:17 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     I think I'm right now on steps 4 and 5 in ->
> >     >
> >     >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes%23release-steps&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb4f3681be8ee401a9edb08d61c7cd8a8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636727719873623282&amp;sdata=4vj7M8%2BYgVfU6EnGXIPz%2BCyd3XxA4kZvCtlly334rww%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >     pon., 17 wrz 2018 o 09:16 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >     >     napisał(a):
> >     >
> >     >     > Hi Alex,
> >     >     >
> >     >     > I think I have passed problem with scm and was able to push
> RC1
> >     > branch,
> >     >     > but I don't understand what do you mean here:
> >     >     >
> >     >     > "I also ran the update.versions target.  It turns out I
> needed
> > to run
> >     >     > several targets first from the empty folder:
> >  use_develop_branch
> >     >     > clone-compiler clone-typedefs clone-asjs update.versions
> >     >     >
> >     >     > And then manually go to each repo and push the changes."
> >     >     >
> >     >     > Do you mean here that I need to run update.version target on
> > develop
> >     > or on
> >     >     > RC branch? I understand that we are jumping one version up,
> so
> > I
> >     > know that
> >     >     > probably need to be updated develop to 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT. Should
> > I do
> >     > any of
> >     >     > that operation on RC branch as well ?
> >     >     >
> >     >     > Thanks,
> >     >     > Piotr
> >     >     >
> >     >     > sob., 15 wrz 2018 o 07:21 Alex Harui
> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
> > >
> >     >     > napisał(a):
> >     >     >
> >     >     >> Hi Piotr,
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >> I think I've figured out how to use maven-scm 1.10.0.  I
> have
> >     > switched
> >     >     >> the version of the release plugin to 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT.  You
> > will have
> >     > to
> >     >     >> build your own release plugin from sources.  The latest
> > published
> >     > snapshot
> >     >     >> is not based on the latest sources so we have to build it
> >     > ourselves.  I
> >     >     >> have added an Ant task to releasecandidate.xml called
> >     >     >> maven-release-plugin.  So, I would recommend starting with
> an
> > empty
> >     > folder
> >     >     >> with just local.properties and the latest
> > releasecandidate.xml and
> >     > running:
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >>     Ant -f releasecandidate.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.4
> -Drc=1
> >     >     >> maven-release-plugin
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >> When that succeeds (it worked first try for me), then run:
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >>     Ant -f releasecandidate.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.4
> -Drc=1
> >     >     >> make_branches
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >> I tried it with a dry run (by uncommenting the
> > pushChanges=false)
> >     > and it
> >     >     >> worked for me on Windows from PowerShell.
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >> I also ran the update.versions target.  It turns out I
> needed
> > to run
> >     >     >> several targets first from the empty folder:
> >  use_develop_branch
> >     >     >> clone-compiler clone-typedefs clone-asjs update.versions
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >> And then manually go to each repo and push the changes.
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >> Hopefully you will be able to use the make_branches to
> update
> > the
> >     > maven
> >     >     >> poms to 0.9 4-SNAPSHOT and then proceed with the
> > releasecandidate.
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >> Good luck!
> >     >     >> -Alex
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >> On 9/14/18, 9:25 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
> >
> > wrote:
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >>     OK.  But by specifying setting-template you are giving
> it
> >     > different
> >     >     >> startup property values.  IMO, best test is to run the same
> > thing
> >     > on your
> >     >     >> command line that Ant is trying to run.
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >>     -Alex
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >>     On 9/14/18, 9:13 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >     >     >> wrote:
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >>         Alex,
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >>         You understand it me wrong. I don't skip tests when
> > I'm
> >     > trying to
> >     >     >> create
> >     >     >>         release candidate. This command is test command - I
> > run it
> >     > just
> >     >     >> to check
> >     >     >>         what pure Maven build download for me - not
> connected
> > with
> >     > ant at
> >     >     >> all.
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >>         Thanks,
> >     >     >>         Piotr
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >>         pt., 14 wrz 2018 o 18:09 Alex Harui
> >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >     >     >> napisał(a):
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >>         > Ant does not specify to use settings-template.  I
> > never
> >     > specify
> >     >     >> that
> >     >     >>         > anymore when running Maven from the command-line.
> >     >     >>         >
> >     >     >>         > FWIW, I think you should not skip tests or rat
> when
> >     > trying to
> >     >     >> create a
> >     >     >>         > release candidate.
> >     >     >>         >
> >     >     >>         > Ant uses a "mvn" variable when trying to launch
> > Maven so
> >     > you can
> >     >     >>         > -Dmvn=<some other path> although I don't think you
> > can add
> >     >     >> other options to
> >     >     >>         > that variable.
> >     >     >>         >
> >     >     >>         > I guess I will try this out myself on Windows.
> >     >     >>         >
> >     >     >>         > HTH
> >     >     >>         > -Alex
> >     >     >>         >
> >     >     >>         > On 9/14/18, 9:02 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >     >     >>         >
> >     >     >>         >     For the tests I run in command line following:
> > mvn -s
> >     >     >>         > settings-template.xml
> >     >     >>         >     -DskipTests -Drat.skip=true clean install - It
> > uses my
> >     >     >> Apache Maven
> >     >     >>         > 3.5.4.
> >     >     >>         >     I would be surprised that Ant run some other
> > Maven - I
> >     >     >> don't have any
> >     >     >>         > other
> >     >     >>         >     installed in my system. I will check as you
> > propose
> >     > from
> >     >     >> Ant.
> >     >     >>         >
> >     >     >>         >
> >     >     >>         >     pt., 14 wrz 2018 o 17:54 Alex Harui
> >     >     >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >     >     >>         > napisał(a):
> >     >     >>         >
> >     >     >>         >     > The Ant script runs (on Windows) whatever
> > mvn.cmd
> >     > maps to
> >     >     >> in the
> >     >     >>         > PATH.
> >     >     >>         >     > What are you typing on the command-line to
> run
> >     > Maven?
> >     >     >>         >     >
> >     >     >>         >     > There are some options for Ant that print
> out
> > more
> >     > info
> >     >     >> or you might
> >     >     >>         > add
> >     >     >>         >     > some other commands to the Ant script to
> help
> >     > figure out
> >     >     >> what
> >     >     >>         > mvn.cmd it is
> >     >     >>         >     > running.  On Windows, I think you can run
> > "where
> >     > mvn.cmd"
> >     >     >> to see
> >     >     >>         > what it is
> >     >     >>         >     > picking up.
> >     >     >>         >     >
> >     >     >>         >     > HTH,
> >     >     >>         >     > -Alex
> >     >     >>         >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >
> >     >     >>         >     > On 9/14/18, 8:05 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >     >     >>         > wrote:
> >     >     >>         >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     I have spent on that again a bunch of
> > time and
> >     >     >> something is
> >     >     >>         > really
> >     >     >>         >     > weird
> >     >     >>         >     >     happen. I've figure out that if Maven is
> > using
> >     > scm
> >     >     >> and we won't
> >     >     >>         > specify
> >     >     >>         >     >     inside pluginManagement tag what version
> > of scm
> >     > is
> >     >     >> used - It will
> >     >     >>         >     > download
> >     >     >>         >     >     some older one.
> >     >     >>         >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     However there is something wrong on the
> > line
> >     > between
> >     >     >>         >     > releasecandidate.xml
> >     >     >>         >     >     and Maven.
> >     >     >>         >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     1) If I run build of royale-compiler
> > using cmd
> >     > or
> >     >     >> even from
> >     >     >>         > Intellij -
> >     >     >>         >     > scm
> >     >     >>         >     >     1.10.0 is being downloaded - correct
> one.
> >     >     >>         >     >     2) If I run release process using
> >     >     >> releasecandidate.xml there is
> >     >     >>         > being
> >     >     >>         >     >     downloaded 1.9.4
> >     >     >>         >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     Any idea why it could happen like that ?
> > This
> >     > file
> >     >     >>         >     > releasecandidate.xml is
> >     >     >>         >     >     used to just launch Maven build, why old
> > scm is
> >     > being
> >     >     >>         > downloaded?!
> >     >     >>         >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     Thanks,
> >     >     >>         >     >     Piotr
> >     >     >>         >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     czw., 13 wrz 2018 o 21:43 Alex Harui
> >     >     >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >     >     >>         >     > napisał(a):
> >     >     >>         >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > I think the console output will show
> > what
> >     > versions
> >     >     >> of plugins
> >     >     >>         > are
> >     >     >>         >     >     > downloaded. You can also check out the
> > local
> >     > maven
> >     >     >> cache.
> >     >     >>         >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > Get Outlook for Android<
> >     >     >>         >     >
> >     >     >>         >
> >     >     >>
> >     >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb4f3681be8ee401a9edb08d61c7cd8a8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636727719873623282&amp;sdata=%2BCfU%2B2Hg73Nr3bm%2FoAhf2%2B%2BbtrL9fCclN7whFIyr1B8%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >     >     >>         >     > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > ________________________________
> >     >     >>         >     >     > From: Piotr Zarzycki <
> >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >     >     >>         >     >     > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018
> > 11:02:29 AM
> >     >     >>         >     >     > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> >     >     >>         >     >     > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start release
> > process
> >     > 0.9.3
> >     >     >>         >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > Unfortunately I don't know how to
> check
> > that.
> >     > I can
> >     >     >> check only
> >     >     >>         >     > "Effective
> >     >     >>         >     >     > Pom" - Intellij is able to show me
> what
> > is
> >     > behind
> >     >     >> the stage in
> >     >     >>         >     > specific
> >     >     >>         >     >     > pom. This is how it looks like for
> main
> > pom in
> >     >     >> royale-asjs ->
> >     >     >>         >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >
> >     >     >>         >
> >     >     >>
> >     >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FeVmK&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb4f3681be8ee401a9edb08d61c7cd8a8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636727719873623282&amp;sdata=lU0LNypNyfW1BS0%2BtPzmr0d8haiC4AotMKQrfpMWvv8%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >     >     >>         >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > Piotr
> >     >     >>         >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > czw., 13 wrz 2018 o 19:42 Alex Harui
> >     >     >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
> >     >     >>         > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > napisał(a):
> >     >     >>         >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > Is maven using scm 1.10?
> >     >     >>         >     >     > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > Get Outlook for Android<
> >     >     >>         >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >
> >     >     >>         >
> >     >     >>
> >     >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb4f3681be8ee401a9edb08d61c7cd8a8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636727719873623282&amp;sdata=%2BCfU%2B2Hg73Nr3bm%2FoAhf2%2B%2BbtrL9fCclN7whFIyr1B8%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >     >     >>         >     >     > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > ________________________________
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > From: Piotr Zarzycki <
> >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018
> > 8:55:29
> >     > AM
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start release
> >     > process 0.9.3
> >     >     >>         >     >     > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > I'm unable to use
> > releasecandidate.xml and
> >     >     >> prepare that
> >     >     >>         > release
> >     >     >>         >     > using
> >     >     >>         >     >     > that
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > script. It's failing constantly,
> > despite my
> >     >     >> attempt of
> >     >     >>         > update scm.
> >     >     >>         >     >     > Failing
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > is happen only on royale-asjs.
> >     >     >>         >     >     > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > I see only option to prepare that
> > release
> >     >     >> manually.
> >     >     >>         >     >     > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > Thanks,
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > Piotr
> >     >     >>         >     >     > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > czw., 13 wrz 2018 o 10:47 Alex Harui
> >     >     >>         > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > napisał(a):
> >     >     >>         >     >     > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > Yes, that might work.  But you
> also
> > have
> >     > to run
> >     >     >> the
> >     >     >>         >     > update.version
> >     >     >>         >     >     > target
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > in Ant.  It looks like I didn't
> > write
> >     > about it
> >     >     >> in the
> >     >     >>         > wiki.  I
> >     >     >>         >     > think
> >     >     >>         >     >     > the
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > command would be something like:
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >   Ant -f releasecandidate.xml
> >     > update.version
> >     >     >>         >     > -Drelease.version=0.9.3
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > I think it will ask you for the
> next
> >     > version to
> >     >     >> use.  I'm
> >     >     >>         > done
> >     >     >>         >     > working
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > for
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > today, so good luck.
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > HTH,
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > -Alex
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > On 9/13/18, 12:52 AM, "Piotr
> > Zarzycki" <
> >     >     >>         >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > wrote:
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     Alex,
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     By that do you mean that I
> > basically
> >     > should
> >     >     >> go two
> >     >     >>         > times
> >     >     >>         >     > with third
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > step of
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     your release steps ? It will
> > give the
> >     >     >> results I think
> >     >     >>         > so.
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     [1]
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >
> >     >     >>         >
> >     >     >>
> >     >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes%23release-steps&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb4f3681be8ee401a9edb08d61c7cd8a8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636727719873633300&amp;sdata=uns5ytN4XDOzv1Mb8U3ol%2FS49h10NXq34%2FOtRdfzgfs%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     Thanks,
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     Piotr
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     czw., 13 wrz 2018 o 09:46 Alex
> > Harui
> >     >     >>         >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > napisał(a):
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > I also noticed that there
> are
> > lots
> >     > of
> >     >     >> references to
> >     >     >>         > 0.9.3
> >     >     >>         >     > in the
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > repo.  If
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > we want to use 0.9.4 as the
> > version
> >     >     >> number, I think
> >     >     >>         > you
> >     >     >>         >     > will have
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > to
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > run
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > the update.version target in
> >     >     >> releasecandidate.xml and
> >     >     >>         >     > update the
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > Maven poms
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > as well.   We've never
> really
> > tried
> >     > to
> >     >     >> skip a version
> >     >     >>         >     > number
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > before,
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > so not
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > exactly sure what needs to
> be
> >     > done.  One
> >     >     >> way that
> >     >     >>         > might
> >     >     >>         >     > work to
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > update
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > Maven poms is to create the
> > release
> >     >     >> branches.  That
> >     >     >>         > should
> >     >     >>         >     > update
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > the
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > version numbers in the
> develop
> >     > branch.
> >     >     >> Then toss the
> >     >     >>         >     > release
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > branch
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > without reverting and create
> > another
> >     >     >> release
> >     >     >>         > branch.  That
> >     >     >>         >     > should
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > update
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > the version numbers in
> > develop to
> >     >     >> 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT
> >     >     >>         > which is
> >     >     >>         >     > what we
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > want, and
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > the release branches should
> > have
> >     > 0.9.4.
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > HTH,
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > -Alex
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > On 9/12/18, 2:18 PM, "Alex
> > Harui"
> >     >     >>         > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
> >     >     >>         >     > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > wrote:
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     The console output
> should
> >     > include
> >     >     >> what version of
> >     >     >>         >     > plugins are
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > downloaded.
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     Get Outlook for Android<
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >
> >     >     >>         >
> >     >     >>
> >     >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb4f3681be8ee401a9edb08d61c7cd8a8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636727719873633300&amp;sdata=9f87scY29nhZxBOLs8QigBmBad87mVwp08CxaBhMu0c%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
> >  ________________________________
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     From: Piotr Zarzycki <
> >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     Sent: Wednesday,
> > September 12,
> >     > 2018
> >     >     >> 9:54:04 AM
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     To:
> dev@royale.apache.org
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     Subject: Re: [Discuss]
> > Start
> >     > release
> >     >     >> process
> >     >     >>         > 0.9.3
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     That's not good, because
> > I was
> >     >     >> updated that
> >     >     >>         > stuff. It
> >     >     >>         >     > looks
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > like
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > it
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > didn't
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     work well. Let me
> > investigate
> >     > more
> >     >     >> scm plugin
> >     >     >>         > stuff
> >     >     >>         >     > and I'm
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > reverting
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     current changes.
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     Thanks!
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     śr., 12 wrz 2018 o 18:39
> > Alex
> >     > Harui
> >     >     >>         >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
> >     >     >>         >     >     > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > napisał(a):
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > That error implies
> that
> >     > maven-scm
> >     >     >> 1.10.0 is not
> >     >     >>         >     > being used.
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > Some
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > older
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > version is.  I
> couldn't
> >     > figure out
> >     >     >> from reading
> >     >     >>         >     > Maven doc
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > exactly
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > how to
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > control that.  We
> might
> > need
> >     > to
> >     >     >> specify it in
> >     >     >>         > the
> >     >     >>         >     > main pom,
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > but I was
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > hoping that if you
> used
> > the
> >     > latest
> >     >     >> Maven it
> >     >     >>         > would
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > automatically
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > bring in
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > that version.
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > Regarding canceling an
> > RC:
> >     > the Ant
> >     >     >> scripts
> >     >     >>         > have
> >     >     >>         >     > targets
> >     >     >>         >     >     > that
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > run
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > other
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > targets that have
> > bunches of
> >     > Ant
> >     >     >> commands.  So
> >     >     >>         > when
> >     >     >>         >     >     > something
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > fails,
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > and
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > you re-start from some
> > Ant
> >     > target,
> >     >     >> it is
> >     >     >>         > expecting
> >     >     >>         >     > certain
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > starting
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > conditions.  So
> > sometimes you
> >     > have
> >     >     >> to revert
> >     >     >>         > commits
> >     >     >>         >     > or
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > delete
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > the
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > branch
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > and tags or sometimes
> > you just
> >     >     >> delete the
> >     >     >>         > working
> >     >     >>         >     > copy.  It
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > depends
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > where
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > you are starting from.
> > There
> >     > are
> >     >     >> some Ant
> >     >     >>         > tasks
> >     >     >>         >     > that start
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > at
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > certain
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > points (like after
> >     > royale-compiler
> >     >     >> and
> >     >     >>         >     > royale-typedefs have
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > been
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > completed)
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > but it isn't so fine
> > grain
> >     > that you
> >     >     >> can start
> >     >     >>         >     > exactly from
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > the
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > point
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > of
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > failure.
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > HTH,
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > -Alex
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > On 9/12/18, 8:46 AM,
> > "Piotr
> >     >     >> Zarzycki" <
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > wrote:
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     I got fail on
> > royale-asjs
> >     > repo
> >     >     >> ->
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >
> >     >     >>         >
> >     >     >>
> >     >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FBzVx&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb4f3681be8ee401a9edb08d61c7cd8a8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636727719873633300&amp;sdata=fD1%2Fqew4nUN%2Fp3%2BG710CCW8HMgpGpJCQmNG7noF9d4w%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     I don't understand
> > one
> >     > thing
> >     >     >> from the
> >     >     >>         >     > instruction.
> >     >     >>         >     >     > Since
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > something
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > failed
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     during branch
> > creation I
> >     > need
> >     >     >> to revert
> >     >     >>         > changes.
> >     >     >>         >     >     > Probably
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > remove
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > branches
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     and revert
> > everything in
> >     >     >> develop. - Yes ?
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     Instruction is
> > saying in
> >     >     >> Canceling RC: "To
> >     >     >>         >     > cancel an RC
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > and
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > generate a
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > new
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     RC, you have to
> > revert
> >     > certain
> >     >     >> changes that
> >     >     >>         >     > Maven made
> >     >     >>         >     >     > to
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > the
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > release
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     branch." - Why
> only
> >     > release
> >     >     >> branch ?
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     Should I not
> remove
> >     > release
> >     >     >> branch ?
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     Thanks,
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     Piotr
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     śr., 12 wrz 2018 o
> > 17:38
> >     > Piotr
> >     >     >> Zarzycki <
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     napisał(a):
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     > I just tried it
> > from
> >     > Git Bash
> >     >     >> and
> >     >     >>         > something
> >     >     >>         >     > started
> >     >     >>         >     >     > to
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > work :)
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     > śr., 12 wrz 2018
> > o 17:36
> >     >     >> Piotr Zarzycki <
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     > napisał(a):
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     >> I just go
> > through SSH
> >     >     >> instruction again
> >     >     >>         > and
> >     >     >>         >     > re-added
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > rsa key
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > to
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > GitHub,
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     >> but no luck so
> > far.
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     >>
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     >> śr., 12 wrz
> 2018
> > o
> >     > 17:36
> >     >     >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >     >     >>         > <
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     >> napisał(a):
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     >>
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     >>> Yes - I have
> > exactly
> >     > two
> >     >     >> files there -
> >     >     >>         > the
> >     >     >>         >     > same as
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > you.
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     >>> śr., 12 wrz
> > 2018 o
> >     > 17:34
> >     >     >> Alex Harui
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > >
> >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     >>> napisał(a):
> >     >     >>         >



-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to