ok, I'll don't change it. If finally we need to change I think it will be
easy to rename a tag in git (I assume that is the name of the tag to create
in git)
thanks

El vie., 28 sept. 2018 a las 17:40, Alex Harui (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
escribió:

> I saw that, but didn't want to take the time to figure out if it is
> correct or not.  You are welcome to do so.  It might be right, as I don't
> think the release/0.9.4 tag has been created.  Maven might update that tag
> when it generates the tag as part of its release process.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/28/18, 2:27 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     ni parent royale-asjs root pom I'm reading on line 49:
>
>     <tag>release/0.9.3</tag>
>
>     maybe this should be updated to 0.9.4?
>
>     El lun., 17 sept. 2018 a las 18:07, Alex Harui
> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
>     escribió:
>
>     > Last week, the develop branch was setup to release as 0.9.3 since the
>     > prior release was 0.9.2.  The scripts and defaults are not set up to
> skip a
>     > version so we discussed ways to skip a version.  It included:
>     >
>     > 1) Running "ant -f releasecandidate.xml update.versions"
>     > 2) Using "ant -f releasecandidate.xml make_branches" twice.
>     >
>     > The first run would set the poms in the release branch to 0.9.3 and
> set
>     > the develop branch to 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT.
>     > The second run would set the poms in the release branch to 0.9.4 and
> set
>     > the develop branch to 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT.
>     >
>     > The correct state of the branches before executing step 4 in
>     >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes%23release-steps&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C656e2ed6e0e447da305c08d625249716%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636737236443123921&amp;sdata=neXHd6FkElNFqukLW%2BEUu5ZRvs4MyEqzMGBAPl9CX9A%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     > is that the develop branch is set to 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT, the release
> branch is
>     > set to 0.9.4, and other version numbers are set to 0.9.4, such as
>     > build.properties in royale-asjs.  That's what update.versions did.
> I did
>     > that a couple of days ago.
>     >
>     > So, to answer your questions:
>     >
>     > 1) No, there shouldn't be any extra Ant targets to run at this time
> other
>     > than maybe running make_branches on some or all of the repos to get
> us to
>     > the desired state.  I think I've taken care of everything that
>     > make_branches doesn't take care of.  I did not try to get all of the
> Maven
>     > pieces in the 3 repos ready because I thought I saw that
> royale-typedefs
>     > was already ready so I didn't know where you were in the process.
> Some of
>     > the targets in releasecandidate.xml run lots of Maven commands which
> will
>     > update the POMs.  Those targets also patch some other things that
> Maven
>     > needs but were hard to make work via Maven.  Since updating the
>     > Maven-related data could not be one simple Maven command, I chose to
> use
>     > Ant to take the RM through all of the steps.   But Ant builds do not
> use
>     > the POM (although I'm still thinking of teaching the compiler to
> read the
>     > POMs) so we have other Ant targets that update things for the Ant
> build of
>     > the framework.  This is normally done during the final "release"
> target
>     > after voting is over, but because we are skipping a version, I had
> to run
>     > it once a few days ago.
>     >
>     > 2)  IMO, the simplest thing to do is update the develop branch so it
> looks
>     > like we released a 0.9.3 before creating the final release branch for
>     > 0.9.4.  That is why I am suggesting running make_branches until you
> reach
>     > that state.  I think I've already taken care of the Ant properties.
>     >
>     > When you think you've got the branches for all repos in this state,
> let me
>     > know and I will spot check it.
>     >
>     > HTH,
>     > -Alex
>     >
>     > On 9/17/18, 2:06 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Still don't understand what you did at all. I did make_branches.
> This
>     > is
>     >     what happened so far:
>     >
>     >     1) feature/0.9.4 -> branch has been created which contains 0.9.3
> in
>     > poms
>     >     2) develop has been updated to 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT
>     >
>     >     Q 1: Should I run on develop ant command which updating for me
> some
>     > stuff ?
>     >     - What ANT do ? Does it update pom or something else ?
>     >     Q 2: Because we would like to jump to one version ahead - Should
> I run
>     > that
>     >     ANT on RC1 branch or should I update it manually ?
>     >
>     >     Thanks,
>     >     Piotr
>     >
>     >
>     >     pon., 17 wrz 2018 o 09:53 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>     > napisał(a):
>     >
>     >     > If you have run make_branches, then the branches should be
> showing
>     > 0.9.4
>     >     > and the develop branch should be using 0.9.5.
>     >     >
>     >     > I already ran and pushed update.versions.  The Ant build
> should be
>     > using
>     >     > 0.9.4.
>     >     >
>     >     > I'm stopping work for tonight.
>     >     >
>     >     > HTH,
>     >     > -Alex
>     >     >
>     >     > On 9/17/18, 12:17 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     > wrote:
>     >     >
>     >     >     I think I'm right now on steps 4 and 5 in ->
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes%23release-steps&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C656e2ed6e0e447da305c08d625249716%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636737236443123921&amp;sdata=neXHd6FkElNFqukLW%2BEUu5ZRvs4MyEqzMGBAPl9CX9A%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >     pon., 17 wrz 2018 o 09:16 Piotr Zarzycki <
>     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     napisał(a):
>     >     >
>     >     >     > Hi Alex,
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > I think I have passed problem with scm and was able to
> push RC1
>     >     > branch,
>     >     >     > but I don't understand what do you mean here:
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > "I also ran the update.versions target.  It turns out I
> needed
>     > to run
>     >     >     > several targets first from the empty folder:
>     >  use_develop_branch
>     >     >     > clone-compiler clone-typedefs clone-asjs update.versions
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > And then manually go to each repo and push the changes."
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > Do you mean here that I need to run update.version
> target on
>     > develop
>     >     > or on
>     >     >     > RC branch? I understand that we are jumping one version
> up, so
>     > I
>     >     > know that
>     >     >     > probably need to be updated develop to 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT.
> Should
>     > I do
>     >     > any of
>     >     >     > that operation on RC branch as well ?
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > Thanks,
>     >     >     > Piotr
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > sob., 15 wrz 2018 o 07:21 Alex Harui
> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
>     > >
>     >     >     > napisał(a):
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >> Hi Piotr,
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >> I think I've figured out how to use maven-scm 1.10.0.
> I have
>     >     > switched
>     >     >     >> the version of the release plugin to 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
> You
>     > will have
>     >     > to
>     >     >     >> build your own release plugin from sources.  The latest
>     > published
>     >     > snapshot
>     >     >     >> is not based on the latest sources so we have to build
> it
>     >     > ourselves.  I
>     >     >     >> have added an Ant task to releasecandidate.xml called
>     >     >     >> maven-release-plugin.  So, I would recommend starting
> with an
>     > empty
>     >     > folder
>     >     >     >> with just local.properties and the latest
>     > releasecandidate.xml and
>     >     > running:
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     Ant -f releasecandidate.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.4
> -Drc=1
>     >     >     >> maven-release-plugin
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >> When that succeeds (it worked first try for me), then
> run:
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     Ant -f releasecandidate.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.4
> -Drc=1
>     >     >     >> make_branches
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >> I tried it with a dry run (by uncommenting the
>     > pushChanges=false)
>     >     > and it
>     >     >     >> worked for me on Windows from PowerShell.
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >> I also ran the update.versions target.  It turns out I
> needed
>     > to run
>     >     >     >> several targets first from the empty folder:
>     >  use_develop_branch
>     >     >     >> clone-compiler clone-typedefs clone-asjs update.versions
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >> And then manually go to each repo and push the changes.
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >> Hopefully you will be able to use the make_branches to
> update
>     > the
>     >     > maven
>     >     >     >> poms to 0.9 4-SNAPSHOT and then proceed with the
>     > releasecandidate.
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >> Good luck!
>     >     >     >> -Alex
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >> On 9/14/18, 9:25 AM, "Alex Harui"
> <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>     > wrote:
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     OK.  But by specifying setting-template you are
> giving it
>     >     > different
>     >     >     >> startup property values.  IMO, best test is to run the
> same
>     > thing
>     >     > on your
>     >     >     >> command line that Ant is trying to run.
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     -Alex
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     On 9/14/18, 9:13 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     >> wrote:
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>         Alex,
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>         You understand it me wrong. I don't skip tests
> when
>     > I'm
>     >     > trying to
>     >     >     >> create
>     >     >     >>         release candidate. This command is test command
> - I
>     > run it
>     >     > just
>     >     >     >> to check
>     >     >     >>         what pure Maven build download for me - not
> connected
>     > with
>     >     > ant at
>     >     >     >> all.
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>         Thanks,
>     >     >     >>         Piotr
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>         pt., 14 wrz 2018 o 18:09 Alex Harui
>     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>     >     >     >> napisał(a):
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>         > Ant does not specify to use
> settings-template.  I
>     > never
>     >     > specify
>     >     >     >> that
>     >     >     >>         > anymore when running Maven from the
> command-line.
>     >     >     >>         >
>     >     >     >>         > FWIW, I think you should not skip tests or
> rat when
>     >     > trying to
>     >     >     >> create a
>     >     >     >>         > release candidate.
>     >     >     >>         >
>     >     >     >>         > Ant uses a "mvn" variable when trying to
> launch
>     > Maven so
>     >     > you can
>     >     >     >>         > -Dmvn=<some other path> although I don't
> think you
>     > can add
>     >     >     >> other options to
>     >     >     >>         > that variable.
>     >     >     >>         >
>     >     >     >>         > I guess I will try this out myself on Windows.
>     >     >     >>         >
>     >     >     >>         > HTH
>     >     >     >>         > -Alex
>     >     >     >>         >
>     >     >     >>         > On 9/14/18, 9:02 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>     >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>     >     >     >>         >
>     >     >     >>         >     For the tests I run in command line
> following:
>     > mvn -s
>     >     >     >>         > settings-template.xml
>     >     >     >>         >     -DskipTests -Drat.skip=true clean install
> - It
>     > uses my
>     >     >     >> Apache Maven
>     >     >     >>         > 3.5.4.
>     >     >     >>         >     I would be surprised that Ant run some
> other
>     > Maven - I
>     >     >     >> don't have any
>     >     >     >>         > other
>     >     >     >>         >     installed in my system. I will check as
> you
>     > propose
>     >     > from
>     >     >     >> Ant.
>     >     >     >>         >
>     >     >     >>         >
>     >     >     >>         >     pt., 14 wrz 2018 o 17:54 Alex Harui
>     >     >     >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>     >     >     >>         > napisał(a):
>     >     >     >>         >
>     >     >     >>         >     > The Ant script runs (on Windows)
> whatever
>     > mvn.cmd
>     >     > maps to
>     >     >     >> in the
>     >     >     >>         > PATH.
>     >     >     >>         >     > What are you typing on the command-line
> to run
>     >     > Maven?
>     >     >     >>         >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     > There are some options for Ant that
> print out
>     > more
>     >     > info
>     >     >     >> or you might
>     >     >     >>         > add
>     >     >     >>         >     > some other commands to the Ant script
> to help
>     >     > figure out
>     >     >     >> what
>     >     >     >>         > mvn.cmd it is
>     >     >     >>         >     > running.  On Windows, I think you can
> run
>     > "where
>     >     > mvn.cmd"
>     >     >     >> to see
>     >     >     >>         > what it is
>     >     >     >>         >     > picking up.
>     >     >     >>         >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     > HTH,
>     >     >     >>         >     > -Alex
>     >     >     >>         >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     > On 9/14/18, 8:05 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>     >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     >>         > wrote:
>     >     >     >>         >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     I have spent on that again a bunch
> of
>     > time and
>     >     >     >> something is
>     >     >     >>         > really
>     >     >     >>         >     > weird
>     >     >     >>         >     >     happen. I've figure out that if
> Maven is
>     > using
>     >     > scm
>     >     >     >> and we won't
>     >     >     >>         > specify
>     >     >     >>         >     >     inside pluginManagement tag what
> version
>     > of scm
>     >     > is
>     >     >     >> used - It will
>     >     >     >>         >     > download
>     >     >     >>         >     >     some older one.
>     >     >     >>         >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     However there is something wrong on
> the
>     > line
>     >     > between
>     >     >     >>         >     > releasecandidate.xml
>     >     >     >>         >     >     and Maven.
>     >     >     >>         >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     1) If I run build of royale-compiler
>     > using cmd
>     >     > or
>     >     >     >> even from
>     >     >     >>         > Intellij -
>     >     >     >>         >     > scm
>     >     >     >>         >     >     1.10.0 is being downloaded -
> correct one.
>     >     >     >>         >     >     2) If I run release process using
>     >     >     >> releasecandidate.xml there is
>     >     >     >>         > being
>     >     >     >>         >     >     downloaded 1.9.4
>     >     >     >>         >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     Any idea why it could happen like
> that ?
>     > This
>     >     > file
>     >     >     >>         >     > releasecandidate.xml is
>     >     >     >>         >     >     used to just launch Maven build,
> why old
>     > scm is
>     >     > being
>     >     >     >>         > downloaded?!
>     >     >     >>         >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     Thanks,
>     >     >     >>         >     >     Piotr
>     >     >     >>         >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     czw., 13 wrz 2018 o 21:43 Alex Harui
>     >     >     >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>     >     >     >>         >     > napisał(a):
>     >     >     >>         >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > I think the console output will
> show
>     > what
>     >     > versions
>     >     >     >> of plugins
>     >     >     >>         > are
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > downloaded. You can also check
> out the
>     > local
>     >     > maven
>     >     >     >> cache.
>     >     >     >>         >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > Get Outlook for Android<
>     >     >     >>         >     >
>     >     >     >>         >
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C656e2ed6e0e447da305c08d625249716%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636737236443123921&amp;sdata=lane5%2BC16lKw8SnqSgx85Nl87W%2F6HycBSjidHb2%2Btvc%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >     >>         >     > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > ________________________________
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > From: Piotr Zarzycki <
>     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018
>     > 11:02:29 AM
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > To: dev@royale.apache.org
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start
> release
>     > process
>     >     > 0.9.3
>     >     >     >>         >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > Unfortunately I don't know how to
> check
>     > that.
>     >     > I can
>     >     >     >> check only
>     >     >     >>         >     > "Effective
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > Pom" - Intellij is able to show
> me what
>     > is
>     >     > behind
>     >     >     >> the stage in
>     >     >     >>         >     > specific
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > pom. This is how it looks like
> for main
>     > pom in
>     >     >     >> royale-asjs ->
>     >     >     >>         >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >
>     >     >     >>         >
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FeVmK&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C656e2ed6e0e447da305c08d625249716%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636737236443123921&amp;sdata=XQ8VcbjSWFq7UBkEEdkCyFtmO6%2FuCxaDyEOGhWhnF48%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >     >>         >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > Piotr
>     >     >     >>         >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > czw., 13 wrz 2018 o 19:42 Alex
> Harui
>     >     >     >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
>     >     >     >>         > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > napisał(a):
>     >     >     >>         >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > Is maven using scm 1.10?
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > Get Outlook for Android<
>     >     >     >>         >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >
>     >     >     >>         >
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C656e2ed6e0e447da305c08d625249716%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636737236443123921&amp;sdata=lane5%2BC16lKw8SnqSgx85Nl87W%2F6HycBSjidHb2%2Btvc%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > ________________________________
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > From: Piotr Zarzycki <
>     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > Sent: Thursday, September 13,
> 2018
>     > 8:55:29
>     >     > AM
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > To: dev@royale.apache.org
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start
> release
>     >     > process 0.9.3
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > I'm unable to use
>     > releasecandidate.xml and
>     >     >     >> prepare that
>     >     >     >>         > release
>     >     >     >>         >     > using
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > that
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > script. It's failing constantly,
>     > despite my
>     >     >     >> attempt of
>     >     >     >>         > update scm.
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > Failing
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > is happen only on royale-asjs.
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > I see only option to prepare
> that
>     > release
>     >     >     >> manually.
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > Thanks,
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > Piotr
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > czw., 13 wrz 2018 o 10:47 Alex
> Harui
>     >     >     >>         > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > napisał(a):
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > Yes, that might work.  But
> you also
>     > have
>     >     > to run
>     >     >     >> the
>     >     >     >>         >     > update.version
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > target
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > in Ant.  It looks like I
> didn't
>     > write
>     >     > about it
>     >     >     >> in the
>     >     >     >>         > wiki.  I
>     >     >     >>         >     > think
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > the
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > command would be something
> like:
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >   Ant -f releasecandidate.xml
>     >     > update.version
>     >     >     >>         >     > -Drelease.version=0.9.3
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > I think it will ask you for
> the next
>     >     > version to
>     >     >     >> use.  I'm
>     >     >     >>         > done
>     >     >     >>         >     > working
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > for
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > today, so good luck.
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > HTH,
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > -Alex
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > On 9/13/18, 12:52 AM, "Piotr
>     > Zarzycki" <
>     >     >     >>         >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > wrote:
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     Alex,
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     By that do you mean that I
>     > basically
>     >     > should
>     >     >     >> go two
>     >     >     >>         > times
>     >     >     >>         >     > with third
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > step of
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     your release steps ? It
> will
>     > give the
>     >     >     >> results I think
>     >     >     >>         > so.
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     [1]
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >
>     >     >     >>         >
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes%23release-steps&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C656e2ed6e0e447da305c08d625249716%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636737236443123921&amp;sdata=neXHd6FkElNFqukLW%2BEUu5ZRvs4MyEqzMGBAPl9CX9A%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     Thanks,
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     Piotr
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     czw., 13 wrz 2018 o 09:46
> Alex
>     > Harui
>     >     >     >>         >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > napisał(a):
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > I also noticed that
> there are
>     > lots
>     >     > of
>     >     >     >> references to
>     >     >     >>         > 0.9.3
>     >     >     >>         >     > in the
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > repo.  If
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > we want to use 0.9.4 as
> the
>     > version
>     >     >     >> number, I think
>     >     >     >>         > you
>     >     >     >>         >     > will have
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > to
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > run
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > the update.version
> target in
>     >     >     >> releasecandidate.xml and
>     >     >     >>         >     > update the
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > Maven poms
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > as well.   We've never
> really
>     > tried
>     >     > to
>     >     >     >> skip a version
>     >     >     >>         >     > number
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > before,
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > so not
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > exactly sure what needs
> to be
>     >     > done.  One
>     >     >     >> way that
>     >     >     >>         > might
>     >     >     >>         >     > work to
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > update
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > Maven poms is to create
> the
>     > release
>     >     >     >> branches.  That
>     >     >     >>         > should
>     >     >     >>         >     > update
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > the
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > version numbers in the
> develop
>     >     > branch.
>     >     >     >> Then toss the
>     >     >     >>         >     > release
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > branch
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > without reverting and
> create
>     > another
>     >     >     >> release
>     >     >     >>         > branch.  That
>     >     >     >>         >     > should
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > update
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > the version numbers in
>     > develop to
>     >     >     >> 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT
>     >     >     >>         > which is
>     >     >     >>         >     > what we
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > want, and
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > the release branches
> should
>     > have
>     >     > 0.9.4.
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > HTH,
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > -Alex
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > On 9/12/18, 2:18 PM,
> "Alex
>     > Harui"
>     >     >     >>         > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
>     >     >     >>         >     > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > wrote:
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     The console output
> should
>     >     > include
>     >     >     >> what version of
>     >     >     >>         >     > plugins are
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > downloaded.
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     Get Outlook for
> Android<
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >
>     >     >     >>         >
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C656e2ed6e0e447da305c08d625249716%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636737236443123921&amp;sdata=lane5%2BC16lKw8SnqSgx85Nl87W%2F6HycBSjidHb2%2Btvc%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
>     >  ________________________________
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     From: Piotr
> Zarzycki <
>     >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     Sent: Wednesday,
>     > September 12,
>     >     > 2018
>     >     >     >> 9:54:04 AM
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     To:
> dev@royale.apache.org
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     Subject: Re:
> [Discuss]
>     > Start
>     >     > release
>     >     >     >> process
>     >     >     >>         > 0.9.3
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     That's not good,
> because
>     > I was
>     >     >     >> updated that
>     >     >     >>         > stuff. It
>     >     >     >>         >     > looks
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > like
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > it
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > didn't
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     work well. Let me
>     > investigate
>     >     > more
>     >     >     >> scm plugin
>     >     >     >>         > stuff
>     >     >     >>         >     > and I'm
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > reverting
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     current changes.
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     Thanks!
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     śr., 12 wrz 2018 o
> 18:39
>     > Alex
>     >     > Harui
>     >     >     >>         >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > napisał(a):
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > That error
> implies that
>     >     > maven-scm
>     >     >     >> 1.10.0 is not
>     >     >     >>         >     > being used.
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > Some
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > older
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > version is.  I
> couldn't
>     >     > figure out
>     >     >     >> from reading
>     >     >     >>         >     > Maven doc
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > exactly
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > how to
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > control that.  We
> might
>     > need
>     >     > to
>     >     >     >> specify it in
>     >     >     >>         > the
>     >     >     >>         >     > main pom,
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > but I was
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > hoping that if
> you used
>     > the
>     >     > latest
>     >     >     >> Maven it
>     >     >     >>         > would
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > automatically
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > bring in
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > that version.
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > Regarding
> canceling an
>     > RC:
>     >     > the Ant
>     >     >     >> scripts
>     >     >     >>         > have
>     >     >     >>         >     > targets
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > that
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > run
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > other
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > targets that have
>     > bunches of
>     >     > Ant
>     >     >     >> commands.  So
>     >     >     >>         > when
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > something
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > fails,
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > and
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > you re-start from
> some
>     > Ant
>     >     > target,
>     >     >     >> it is
>     >     >     >>         > expecting
>     >     >     >>         >     > certain
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > starting
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > conditions.  So
>     > sometimes you
>     >     > have
>     >     >     >> to revert
>     >     >     >>         > commits
>     >     >     >>         >     > or
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > delete
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > the
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > branch
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > and tags or
> sometimes
>     > you just
>     >     >     >> delete the
>     >     >     >>         > working
>     >     >     >>         >     > copy.  It
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > depends
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > where
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > you are starting
> from.
>     > There
>     >     > are
>     >     >     >> some Ant
>     >     >     >>         > tasks
>     >     >     >>         >     > that start
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > at
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > certain
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > points (like after
>     >     > royale-compiler
>     >     >     >> and
>     >     >     >>         >     > royale-typedefs have
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > been
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > completed)
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > but it isn't so
> fine
>     > grain
>     >     > that you
>     >     >     >> can start
>     >     >     >>         >     > exactly from
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > the
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > point
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > of
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > failure.
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > HTH,
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > -Alex
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > On 9/12/18, 8:46
> AM,
>     > "Piotr
>     >     >     >> Zarzycki" <
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > wrote:
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     I got fail on
>     > royale-asjs
>     >     > repo
>     >     >     >> ->
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >
>     >     >     >>         >
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FBzVx&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C656e2ed6e0e447da305c08d625249716%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636737236443123921&amp;sdata=5oC7QklV65jO3WCXiaDYNgttQ91CKiJTpb%2BZq46Tnxc%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     I don't
> understand
>     > one
>     >     > thing
>     >     >     >> from the
>     >     >     >>         >     > instruction.
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > Since
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     > something
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > failed
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     during branch
>     > creation I
>     >     > need
>     >     >     >> to revert
>     >     >     >>         > changes.
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > Probably
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > > remove
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     > branches
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     and revert
>     > everything in
>     >     >     >> develop. - Yes ?
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > >     >     >     Instruction is
>     > saying in
>     >     >     >> Canceling RC: "To
>     >     >     >>         >     > cancel an RC
>     >     >     >>         >     >     > > and
>     >     >     >>



-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to