Hi Alex, I tried the link and is working for me, so don't what we can do. Maybe I can try to rename the page to something simpler. Going to try
El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 18:17, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>) escribió: > IMO, this proposal is too high-level and misses the key technical aspect > of the discussion. > > But first, for me, link [2] goes to a blank page. Is it working for > others? Once I get it working for me, I recommend we end this thread, > cancel the vote thread and I will try to use link [2] to provide a summary > of the technical discussion in another thread. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 4/1/20, 2:40 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > after many days of going in circles here's a propossal thread as other > PMCs > requested and will be followed by a Vote thread. > > So the proposal is the following: > > Apache Royale needs a reliable, easy process to release often. We still > don't have that, so we propose to release as the rest of Apache > projects do > [1] by using a tested Maven process [2]. > > There's as well another current way [3] that RMs can choose as well. > So use > [2] or [3] depending on what works for them better. > > About [2] we tested full release and the output did work in any > tested IDE > (Moonshine and VSCode). The source-bundles compiled without any issues > in > Ant and Maven and the Maven artifacts worked perfectly in a test > project. > So technically speaking seems ready to go (although as worked in real > could > expect some little changes). > > About [3], it was the system used to release 0.9.6, but trying to do > 0.9.7 > was not possible by some volunteers for that reason some of us want > more > options and propose [2]. > > But we want [3] continue to be an option for all volunteers that want > to > investigate and invest time on it. > > Main ponts: > > 1.- One process (taking about [2] and [3]) should not be over the > other. > 2.- It's up to the RM to choose one or the other, whatever he wants to > do > to get the release in best conditions and the work done faster, the > better, > and do the release with that choose. > 3.- Release process can't block enhancements to build process, since > more > changes in the future are expected in build systems (even add more), so > it's up to people choosing [2] or [3] invest the time to adapt to new > changes, as any other thing in an ASF project "not to expect others do > it > for you, do yourself". > > The objective is not block any of the two process and releases doing > with > one or the other will be valid and could be voted as official Apache > Royale > releases. > > So will request your vote to any Apache Royale PMC, Commiter and user > in > this list. > > PMCs are binding votes. > > Thanks > > Carlos > > > [1] > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FChristoferDutz%2Fstatus%2F1240219399551934473&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf1db4ac0d6d24c4bd18008d7d620af29%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637213308177302922&sdata=HGFWpL5SYeOAt4zcUKnVH1DsYq0v%2FMPEZR1MuM0Dnlg%3D&reserved=0 > [2] > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-(already-tested&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf1db4ac0d6d24c4bd18008d7d620af29%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637213308177302922&sdata=%2BTmNGB21fnS%2B%2Fy8wUQ9hfTJJBmy%2F3GDOvNp5jO5KWng%3D&reserved=0) > [3] > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf1db4ac0d6d24c4bd18008d7d620af29%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637213308177302922&sdata=9Uyz2xpVYoCAa7Ngrxlxls0NYQM7Uy5kYxMP4wyaXXY%3D&reserved=0 > > -- > Carlos Rovira > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf1db4ac0d6d24c4bd18008d7d620af29%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637213308177302922&sdata=Lc30uUnGl2qpJwgXBRyonMPwvbkZ%2BCPV3FOUFQvJRpo%3D&reserved=0 > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
