IMO, the choices in the proposal are not the ones that need to be decided by 
vote, or really at all.

The proposal is not including a key technical detail and may cause people to 
vote in a way that they wouldn't if they understood the key technical pieces.

-Alex

On 4/1/20, 11:10 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote:

    ok thanks,
    
    about cancelling vote. Piotr, Yishay and I thought it was time to vote.
    Harbs expressed to cancel, but seems was due to still couldn't catch with
    all the info we generated this weeks.
    You want to cancel to discuss the technical solution about process [2]. But
    this Vote thread is not about that. I think we already proved is a valid
    process and generates a valid release, and I'm open to continue updating
    and improving it as usual. The vote is about choices and not impose just
    one method, that's about what I'm worried, I think maybe we don't need to
    vote if we all are in the boat, and since we didn't vote at any point in
    our history about just use one CI Server as unique option for releases. If
    we are ok on that I think we can cancel this vote.
    
    thanks
    
    
    
    El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 18:53, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>)
    escribió:
    
    > Worked.
    >
    > On 4/1/20, 9:52 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >     worked?
    >     thanks
    >
    >     El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 18:46, Alex Harui 
(<[email protected]
    > >)
    >     escribió:
    >
    >     > OK, thanks.
    >     >
    >     > On 4/1/20, 9:39 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >     >
    >     >     Hi new link for [2]
    >     >
    >     >     let's see if that works
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >     [2]
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FNew-Release-Manager&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cfec0cd8f8334431a777608d7d667fe3e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637213614446591239&amp;sdata=mLVmFkuitptLPR0hqM9XniePJnKB9UpYTadNFJh39Uk%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >
    >     --
    >     Carlos Rovira
    >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cfec0cd8f8334431a777608d7d667fe3e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637213614446591239&amp;sdata=SJH7tSQiXqzAVnXawcyWI%2FegpxyBiY3%2FkA%2BxFxsJUFg%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >
    >
    >
    
    -- 
    Carlos Rovira
    
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cfec0cd8f8334431a777608d7d667fe3e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637213614446591239&amp;sdata=SJH7tSQiXqzAVnXawcyWI%2FegpxyBiY3%2FkA%2BxFxsJUFg%3D&amp;reserved=0
    

Reply via email to