Carlos. This is hopefully my last email on this topic until this evening when I can get back to it.
The 3 points are not disagreed upon at the high-level they are stated at. What is disagreed is what the technical impiications of that are. I am going to take the time to try to carefully and accurately write a summary of the actual points of disagreement. Thanks, -Alex On 4/1/20, 11:35 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Alex, propossal at a glance is: 1.- One process should not be over the other. 2.- It's up to the RM to choose one or the other. 3.- Release process can't block enhancements to build process We're not voting technical details. It's about freedom. We're voting that RM can use whatever way is available that produces a valid release to Vote. This is just what Apache process requires. IOW, since I already said that I'm not to use CI Server due to my experience, even if you get it to work. I want to know if anyone here could have a problem if they want to release with other method than CI Server. Technical improvements to each process can be done in other threads without problems. El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 20:19, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>) escribió: > IMO, the choices in the proposal are not the ones that need to be decided > by vote, or really at all. > > The proposal is not including a key technical detail and may cause people > to vote in a way that they wouldn't if they understood the key technical > pieces. > > -Alex > > On 4/1/20, 11:10 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote: > > ok thanks, > > about cancelling vote. Piotr, Yishay and I thought it was time to vote. > Harbs expressed to cancel, but seems was due to still couldn't catch > with > all the info we generated this weeks. > You want to cancel to discuss the technical solution about process > [2]. But > this Vote thread is not about that. I think we already proved is a > valid > process and generates a valid release, and I'm open to continue > updating > and improving it as usual. The vote is about choices and not impose > just > one method, that's about what I'm worried, I think maybe we don't need > to > vote if we all are in the boat, and since we didn't vote at any point > in > our history about just use one CI Server as unique option for > releases. If > we are ok on that I think we can cancel this vote. > > thanks > > > > El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 18:53, Alex Harui (<[email protected] > >) > escribió: > > > Worked. > > > > On 4/1/20, 9:52 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > worked? > > thanks > > > > El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 18:46, Alex Harui > (<[email protected] > > >) > > escribió: > > > > > OK, thanks. > > > > > > On 4/1/20, 9:39 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > Hi new link for [2] > > > > > > let's see if that works > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FNew-Release-Manager&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb60271fda01d4cbccf4a08d7d66b6370%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637213629026849650&sdata=4ptqx%2BeO3Bs1htl%2FwOZazm6l9YKie5YTQS4gA1N725A%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb60271fda01d4cbccf4a08d7d66b6370%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637213629026849650&sdata=Rzu9YWpUBfbWZsisa0d%2BJ5XcoA3ptei1V8ugCZ5%2FrtQ%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb60271fda01d4cbccf4a08d7d66b6370%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637213629026849650&sdata=Rzu9YWpUBfbWZsisa0d%2BJ5XcoA3ptei1V8ugCZ5%2FrtQ%3D&reserved=0 > > > -- Carlos Rovira https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb60271fda01d4cbccf4a08d7d66b6370%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637213629026849650&sdata=Rzu9YWpUBfbWZsisa0d%2BJ5XcoA3ptei1V8ugCZ5%2FrtQ%3D&reserved=0
