ok thanks, about cancelling vote. Piotr, Yishay and I thought it was time to vote. Harbs expressed to cancel, but seems was due to still couldn't catch with all the info we generated this weeks. You want to cancel to discuss the technical solution about process [2]. But this Vote thread is not about that. I think we already proved is a valid process and generates a valid release, and I'm open to continue updating and improving it as usual. The vote is about choices and not impose just one method, that's about what I'm worried, I think maybe we don't need to vote if we all are in the boat, and since we didn't vote at any point in our history about just use one CI Server as unique option for releases. If we are ok on that I think we can cancel this vote.
thanks El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 18:53, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Worked. > > On 4/1/20, 9:52 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote: > > worked? > thanks > > El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 18:46, Alex Harui (<[email protected] > >) > escribió: > > > OK, thanks. > > > > On 4/1/20, 9:39 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi new link for [2] > > > > let's see if that works > > > > > > > > [2] > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FNew-Release-Manager&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd81c9787e418485aee3c08d7d65d0058%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637213567232366556&sdata=BNg9HAIzaikKJzL1iJRPlDPkLfZDBSvRaa8KW5ojLHM%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd81c9787e418485aee3c08d7d65d0058%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637213567232366556&sdata=OnwB8r4pKt36TLvQkzdTwIvYGmvg%2FftHKYG%2FqL9rHt8%3D&reserved=0 > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
