I dont think we have a list of them per-say.  Looking through the
JIRAs labeled with 2.5.0 I found SHINDIG-1539 [1] which tries to few
some gaps in the social data objects.  I updated the patch from James
so it builds against trunk and created a review for it [2].  I think
SHINDIG-1539 and SHINDIG-1878 are pretty much dups.  We should apply
one of the reviews and close both of them.  I am try and see if there
are differences between the two.

The other gap I can think of is the External Services section in the
spec [3].  @Henry weren't you working on a patch for this?

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1539
[2] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/
[3] 
http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/trunk/Core-Gadget.xml#ExternalServices

On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not exactly, we have using JIRA to capture the differences. Mostly the
> differences come from the data model where new fields are introduced or
> have name changes.
>
> The big ticket AFAIK is SHINDIG-1878.
>
> I am +1 and reccommend for 2.5.0 release. It is been long overdue and
> everybody have been putting a lot of good work.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Henr
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Matt Franklin 
> <m.ben.frank...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, March 16, 2013, Ryan Baxter wrote:
>>
>> > Hey everyone,
>> >
>> > 2.5.0-beta6 is out the door (thanks everyone for their hard work) and
>> > I think we are at a point where 2.5.0 is pretty much ready for a
>> > release.  Defects have been slow to come in over the past few weeks
>> > and from my point of view things are pretty stable.   I know there are
>> > still some gaps between what is implemented in Shindig and what is in
>> > the 2.5.0 OpenSocial spec
>>
>>
>> do we at least have these gaps captured anywhere?
>>
>>
>> > but I think it is also important to get a
>> > non-beta release out there for other projects to consume.  If everyone
>> > is OK with this our next release will be the official 2.5.0 release
>> > and will not have a beta tag.
>>
>>
>> > -Ryan
>> >
>>

Reply via email to