Yes I just uploaded the newest patch from my workspace, if you have a
chance take a look at the samples module.  I am just not familiar
enough with JPA to know what is wrong...

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I fixed couple issues before. So the patches for the udpated data model is
> in that review entry?
>
> I can try it out.
>
> - Henry
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Henry I actually have most of the 2 patches integrated together [1].
>> I need to some help with the JPA stuff some of the unit tests are
>> failing, are you familiar with that code at all?
>>
>> [1] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Yeah, I have been distracted with so many items so did not have time to
>> > finish it =(
>> >
>> > Do you guys think it is a blocker for 2.5.0 release?
>> >
>> >
>> > - Henry
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I dont think we have a list of them per-say.  Looking through the
>> >> JIRAs labeled with 2.5.0 I found SHINDIG-1539 [1] which tries to few
>> >> some gaps in the social data objects.  I updated the patch from James
>> >> so it builds against trunk and created a review for it [2].  I think
>> >> SHINDIG-1539 and SHINDIG-1878 are pretty much dups.  We should apply
>> >> one of the reviews and close both of them.  I am try and see if there
>> >> are differences between the two.
>> >>
>> >> The other gap I can think of is the External Services section in the
>> >> spec [3].  @Henry weren't you working on a patch for this?
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1539
>> >> [2] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/
>> >> [3]
>> >>
>> http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/trunk/Core-Gadget.xml#ExternalServices
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Henry Saputra <
>> henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Not exactly, we have using JIRA to capture the differences. Mostly the
>> >> > differences come from the data model where new fields are introduced
>> or
>> >> > have name changes.
>> >> >
>> >> > The big ticket AFAIK is SHINDIG-1878.
>> >> >
>> >> > I am +1 and reccommend for 2.5.0 release. It is been long overdue and
>> >> > everybody have been putting a lot of good work.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > Henr
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Matt Franklin <
>> m.ben.frank...@gmail.com
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Saturday, March 16, 2013, Ryan Baxter wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hey everyone,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 2.5.0-beta6 is out the door (thanks everyone for their hard work)
>> and
>> >> >> > I think we are at a point where 2.5.0 is pretty much ready for a
>> >> >> > release.  Defects have been slow to come in over the past few weeks
>> >> >> > and from my point of view things are pretty stable.   I know there
>> are
>> >> >> > still some gaps between what is implemented in Shindig and what is
>> in
>> >> >> > the 2.5.0 OpenSocial spec
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> do we at least have these gaps captured anywhere?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > but I think it is also important to get a
>> >> >> > non-beta release out there for other projects to consume.  If
>> everyone
>> >> >> > is OK with this our next release will be the official 2.5.0 release
>> >> >> > and will not have a beta tag.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > -Ryan
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>

Reply via email to