Yeah, I have been distracted with so many items so did not have time to
finish it =(

Do you guys think it is a blocker for 2.5.0 release?


- Henry


On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org> wrote:

> I dont think we have a list of them per-say.  Looking through the
> JIRAs labeled with 2.5.0 I found SHINDIG-1539 [1] which tries to few
> some gaps in the social data objects.  I updated the patch from James
> so it builds against trunk and created a review for it [2].  I think
> SHINDIG-1539 and SHINDIG-1878 are pretty much dups.  We should apply
> one of the reviews and close both of them.  I am try and see if there
> are differences between the two.
>
> The other gap I can think of is the External Services section in the
> spec [3].  @Henry weren't you working on a patch for this?
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1539
> [2] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/
> [3]
> http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/trunk/Core-Gadget.xml#ExternalServices
>
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Not exactly, we have using JIRA to capture the differences. Mostly the
> > differences come from the data model where new fields are introduced or
> > have name changes.
> >
> > The big ticket AFAIK is SHINDIG-1878.
> >
> > I am +1 and reccommend for 2.5.0 release. It is been long overdue and
> > everybody have been putting a lot of good work.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Henr
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Matt Franklin <m.ben.frank...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> On Saturday, March 16, 2013, Ryan Baxter wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hey everyone,
> >> >
> >> > 2.5.0-beta6 is out the door (thanks everyone for their hard work) and
> >> > I think we are at a point where 2.5.0 is pretty much ready for a
> >> > release.  Defects have been slow to come in over the past few weeks
> >> > and from my point of view things are pretty stable.   I know there are
> >> > still some gaps between what is implemented in Shindig and what is in
> >> > the 2.5.0 OpenSocial spec
> >>
> >>
> >> do we at least have these gaps captured anywhere?
> >>
> >>
> >> > but I think it is also important to get a
> >> > non-beta release out there for other projects to consume.  If everyone
> >> > is OK with this our next release will be the official 2.5.0 release
> >> > and will not have a beta tag.
> >>
> >>
> >> > -Ryan
> >> >
> >>
>

Reply via email to