Not really a blocker in my opinion, but I felt like we were close to getting it in so I would at least try to make the effort ;)
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ugh sorry for late reply. No I did not have time to look at it. > > I guess it is blocker for 2.5? I will take a look at it later today. > > > - Henry > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Henry, have you had a sometime to look into this at all? Would like >> to get this into 2.5. >> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Yes I just uploaded the newest patch from my workspace, if you have a >> > chance take a look at the samples module. I am just not familiar >> > enough with JPA to know what is wrong... >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> I fixed couple issues before. So the patches for the udpated data model >> is >> >> in that review entry? >> >> >> >> I can try it out. >> >> >> >> - Henry >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Henry I actually have most of the 2 patches integrated together [1]. >> >>> I need to some help with the JPA stuff some of the unit tests are >> >>> failing, are you familiar with that code at all? >> >>> >> >>> [1] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/ >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Henry Saputra < >> henry.sapu...@gmail.com> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > Yeah, I have been distracted with so many items so did not have time >> to >> >>> > finish it =( >> >>> > >> >>> > Do you guys think it is a blocker for 2.5.0 release? >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > - Henry >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> >> I dont think we have a list of them per-say. Looking through the >> >>> >> JIRAs labeled with 2.5.0 I found SHINDIG-1539 [1] which tries to few >> >>> >> some gaps in the social data objects. I updated the patch from >> James >> >>> >> so it builds against trunk and created a review for it [2]. I think >> >>> >> SHINDIG-1539 and SHINDIG-1878 are pretty much dups. We should apply >> >>> >> one of the reviews and close both of them. I am try and see if >> there >> >>> >> are differences between the two. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> The other gap I can think of is the External Services section in the >> >>> >> spec [3]. @Henry weren't you working on a patch for this? >> >>> >> >> >>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1539 >> >>> >> [2] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/ >> >>> >> [3] >> >>> >> >> >>> >> http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/trunk/Core-Gadget.xml#ExternalServices >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Henry Saputra < >> >>> henry.sapu...@gmail.com> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >> > Not exactly, we have using JIRA to capture the differences. >> Mostly the >> >>> >> > differences come from the data model where new fields are >> introduced >> >>> or >> >>> >> > have name changes. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > The big ticket AFAIK is SHINDIG-1878. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > I am +1 and reccommend for 2.5.0 release. It is been long overdue >> and >> >>> >> > everybody have been putting a lot of good work. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > Thanks, >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > Henr >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Matt Franklin < >> >>> m.ben.frank...@gmail.com >> >>> >> >wrote: >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >> On Saturday, March 16, 2013, Ryan Baxter wrote: >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> > Hey everyone, >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > 2.5.0-beta6 is out the door (thanks everyone for their hard >> work) >> >>> and >> >>> >> >> > I think we are at a point where 2.5.0 is pretty much ready for >> a >> >>> >> >> > release. Defects have been slow to come in over the past few >> weeks >> >>> >> >> > and from my point of view things are pretty stable. I know >> there >> >>> are >> >>> >> >> > still some gaps between what is implemented in Shindig and >> what is >> >>> in >> >>> >> >> > the 2.5.0 OpenSocial spec >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> do we at least have these gaps captured anywhere? >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> > but I think it is also important to get a >> >>> >> >> > non-beta release out there for other projects to consume. If >> >>> everyone >> >>> >> >> > is OK with this our next release will be the official 2.5.0 >> release >> >>> >> >> > and will not have a beta tag. >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> > -Ryan >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>
