Henry I actually have most of the 2 patches integrated together [1]. I need to some help with the JPA stuff some of the unit tests are failing, are you familiar with that code at all?
[1] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/ On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I have been distracted with so many items so did not have time to > finish it =( > > Do you guys think it is a blocker for 2.5.0 release? > > > - Henry > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I dont think we have a list of them per-say. Looking through the >> JIRAs labeled with 2.5.0 I found SHINDIG-1539 [1] which tries to few >> some gaps in the social data objects. I updated the patch from James >> so it builds against trunk and created a review for it [2]. I think >> SHINDIG-1539 and SHINDIG-1878 are pretty much dups. We should apply >> one of the reviews and close both of them. I am try and see if there >> are differences between the two. >> >> The other gap I can think of is the External Services section in the >> spec [3]. @Henry weren't you working on a patch for this? >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1539 >> [2] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/ >> [3] >> http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/trunk/Core-Gadget.xml#ExternalServices >> >> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Not exactly, we have using JIRA to capture the differences. Mostly the >> > differences come from the data model where new fields are introduced or >> > have name changes. >> > >> > The big ticket AFAIK is SHINDIG-1878. >> > >> > I am +1 and reccommend for 2.5.0 release. It is been long overdue and >> > everybody have been putting a lot of good work. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Henr >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Matt Franklin <m.ben.frank...@gmail.com >> >wrote: >> > >> >> On Saturday, March 16, 2013, Ryan Baxter wrote: >> >> >> >> > Hey everyone, >> >> > >> >> > 2.5.0-beta6 is out the door (thanks everyone for their hard work) and >> >> > I think we are at a point where 2.5.0 is pretty much ready for a >> >> > release. Defects have been slow to come in over the past few weeks >> >> > and from my point of view things are pretty stable. I know there are >> >> > still some gaps between what is implemented in Shindig and what is in >> >> > the 2.5.0 OpenSocial spec >> >> >> >> >> >> do we at least have these gaps captured anywhere? >> >> >> >> >> >> > but I think it is also important to get a >> >> > non-beta release out there for other projects to consume. If everyone >> >> > is OK with this our next release will be the official 2.5.0 release >> >> > and will not have a beta tag. >> >> >> >> >> >> > -Ryan >> >> > >> >> >>