> Add this point I'm a little bit unsure which way to go with the starter, > therefore asking for feedback. I'm currently leaning towards the second > option: just creating a feature archive for the starter (which we can > already do today) > > WDYT?
+1, I think it makes a lot of sense to decouple the things a little at least initially. If we want more integrated solutions later we can always add them in addition but having a decoupled base option makes the most sense to me. Especially, I think that is interesting in the context of the OSGi Connect / Felix Atomos movement. If we get things right, we might be able to just switch back and forth between running connected and normally. When I did the url refactoring for the artifact provider I was hoping we could make it so that we use the archive directly as a repository - I think that would be helpful in the connect case too. regards, Karl > Regards > Carsten > > > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > Adobe Research Switzerland > cziege...@apache.org -- Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com