Hi Carsten, On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 10:21 +0100, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Add this point I'm a little bit unsure which way to go with the > starter, > therefore asking for feedback. I'm currently leaning towards the > second > option: just creating a feature archive for the starter (which we > can > already do today)
I am not 100% sure I get the difference. With the 'classic' starter, we would produce a single, fat, jar that contains everything. What would be the proposal for the feature archive based jar? Do we ask the users to download a launcher jar and then run a command similar to $ java -jar launcher.jar --feature-archive=https://maven/repo/archive.zip? I assume the option is there to also load a feature archive from the local disk, so that the launcher can work with requiring any network access as well. Thanks, Robert
