http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5497





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-07 07:12 -------
Don't these autolearn thresholds need to be _proportional_? Using your corpus as
a metric, if you're only autolearning 1.21% of ham, don't you want to adjust the
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam value to only autolearn 1.21% of spam, too?

Otherwise, what I'm seeing at my site (regardless of size, I believe), is that
the bayes data is much less accurate and is more easily be influenced by bayes
poisoning (image spam + normal dictionary words, sentences, and paragraphs
hidden behind or below the image)... without a proportional ham differential.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to