https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7982
--- Comment #23 from Henrik Krohns <apa...@hege.li> --- (In reply to Sidney Markowitz from comment #22) > The test t/spf.t calls disable_compat "welcomelist_blocklist" and then > expects to see USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST in the results. Is that a correct thing > to have in the test now, or should it be changed to look for > USER_SPF_WELCOMELIST? I would expect all the original rules like t/spf.t and t/*whitelist*.t to hit WHITELIST rules. All the new t/spf_welcome_block.t etc are supposed to hit WELCOMELIST rules. I assumed that after some time testing old names would become deprecated and renamed over like t/spf_welcome_block.t -> t/spf.t, so we only test for WELCOMELIST. If required, that could probably even be done now, most likely the WLBL stuff is tested enough already and we should not changes to trunk that breaks it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
