Hi Rupert, all, I would envisage this for 1.0.0. But I'm not sure about ContentHub/CMS Adapter. One hand there hasn't been any activity during the last 6 month on the other hand in the Fusepool project because of the limitation of having the RDF metadata detached from the Solr index we have replaced it with ECS (Backend) and Firstswim (GUI). The Fuseppol project would be excited to contribute these back into Stanbol. For a demo see: http://beta.fusepool.com/firstswim
Cheers, Reto 1. https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-ecs 2. https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-firstswim On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Rupert Westenthaler < rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I was considering to create Stanbol launchers without data bundles in > the release branch. This would allow us to do a binary release. > > We could create launchers for > > * stateless (Enhancer & Entityhub) > * semindexing (Stateless & Contenthub & CMS Adapter) > * reasoning (Ontologymanager & Rules & Reasoning) > * full (all stanbol modules) > > In addition we could include the Entityhub indexing tools as binary > releases. > > WDYT > Rupert > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@wymiwyg.com> > wrote: > > Hi Fabian > > > > As we might need to build more release candidates I suggest to do this in > > the release branch. For the release plugin to work it will afaik be > > necessary to adapt the svn url in the pom > > > > Cheers, > > Reto > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Fabian Christ < > christ.fab...@googlemail.com > >> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> good to hear about the progress ;) > >> > >> I am currently checking that the trunk is fine when trying to build > >> with the apache-release profile (this includes the RAT check). Once > >> this succeeds we could create the release branch. > >> > >> Best, > >> - Fabian > >> > >> 2013/10/19 Andreas Kuckartz <a.kucka...@ping.de>: > >> > Rupert Westenthaler: > >> >> However there is still no progress on the build issues of Andreas. As > >> >> explained in [4] I can see in the log what is going wrong, but I have > >> >> still no idea why this is happening in Andreas environment. All my > >> >> tries to reproduce this where not successful. > >> > > >> > I have executed and am executing more experiments with the integration > >> > tests and will report today or tomorrow. I think that I observed > >> > something during the start of the launcher which might or might not > have > >> > something to do with the issues. > >> > > >> > A good thing is that I have no problem reproducing the issues ;-) > >> > > >> >> Still I would suggest to close the trunk for new things ASAP. Release > >> >> related bug fixes can still be done during the release preparation > and > >> >> while checking/voting for the release candidates. > >> > > >> > +1 > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > Andreas > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Fabian > >> http://twitter.com/fctwitt > >> > > > > -- > | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com > | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 > | A-5500 Bischofshofen >
