Hi All +1 to use Manifold to replace CMS Adapter of Stanbol. Moreover using Manifold we can keep the right permission of documents in Stanbol for each user.
I have used Manifold and implemented/modified some connectors so I could help in this task if everyone agrees. Regards On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com> wrote: > So, if you all think it is a good idea, I will create an issue to start > working on it. > > +1 about Fusepool ECS. I have check its Github entry but would be fine to > have more details in order to know the differences with ContentHub. > > Cheers, > Rafa > > El 21/10/13 15:37, Rupert Westenthaler escribió: > > Hi all, >> >> Replacing the CMS Adapter with Manifoldcf seams like a good Idea as it >> seams that this whole Apache project aims to do similar things as this >> Stanbol component. >> >> Regarding the Fusepool ECS: Are there more information about the >> features/architecture of this component? The demo shows that it does >> support full text search and some kind of faceting, but it is hard to >> see how similar/different it is in comparison with the current >> Contenthub. >> >> best >> Rupert >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Reto, >>> >>> We once were thinking to develop another implementation of the CMS >>> Adapter >>> based on Apache Manifold (http://manifoldcf.apache.org/**) for example >>> using >>> the CMIS Repository and Authority Connector and developing an Output >>> Connector for Stanbol. I think that maybe that could be a more >>> maintainable >>> solution. >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> El 21/10/13 14:13, Reto Bachmann-Gmür escribió: >>> >>> Hi Rupert, all, >>>> >>>> I would envisage this for 1.0.0. But I'm not sure about ContentHub/CMS >>>> Adapter. One hand there hasn't been any activity during the last 6 month >>>> on >>>> the other hand in the Fusepool project because of the limitation of >>>> having >>>> the RDF metadata detached from the Solr index we have replaced it with >>>> ECS >>>> (Backend) and Firstswim (GUI). The Fuseppol project would be excited to >>>> contribute these back into Stanbol. For a demo see: >>>> http://beta.fusepool.com/**firstswim<http://beta.fusepool.com/firstswim> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Reto >>>> >>>> >>>> 1. >>>> https://github.com/fusepool/**fusepool-ecs<https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-ecs> >>>> 2. >>>> https://github.com/fusepool/**fusepool-firstswim<https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-firstswim> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Rupert Westenthaler < >>>> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I was considering to create Stanbol launchers without data bundles in >>>>> the release branch. This would allow us to do a binary release. >>>>> >>>>> We could create launchers for >>>>> >>>>> * stateless (Enhancer & Entityhub) >>>>> * semindexing (Stateless & Contenthub & CMS Adapter) >>>>> * reasoning (Ontologymanager & Rules & Reasoning) >>>>> * full (all stanbol modules) >>>>> >>>>> In addition we could include the Entityhub indexing tools as binary >>>>> releases. >>>>> >>>>> WDYT >>>>> Rupert >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@wymiwyg.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Fabian >>>>>> >>>>>> As we might need to build more release candidates I suggest to do this >>>>>> in >>>>>> the release branch. For the release plugin to work it will afaik be >>>>>> necessary to adapt the svn url in the pom >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Reto >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Fabian Christ < >>>>>> >>>>> christ.fab...@googlemail.com >>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> good to hear about the progress ;) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am currently checking that the trunk is fine when trying to build >>>>>>> with the apache-release profile (this includes the RAT check). Once >>>>>>> this succeeds we could create the release branch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> - Fabian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2013/10/19 Andreas Kuckartz <a.kucka...@ping.de>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rupert Westenthaler: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> However there is still no progress on the build issues of Andreas. >>>>>>>>> As >>>>>>>>> explained in [4] I can see in the log what is going wrong, but I >>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>> still no idea why this is happening in Andreas environment. All my >>>>>>>>> tries to reproduce this where not successful. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have executed and am executing more experiments with the >>>>>>>> integration >>>>>>>> tests and will report today or tomorrow. I think that I observed >>>>>>>> something during the start of the launcher which might or might not >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> have >>>>> >>>>>> something to do with the issues. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A good thing is that I have no problem reproducing the issues ;-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Still I would suggest to close the trunk for new things ASAP. >>>>>>>>> Release >>>>>>>>> related bug fixes can still be done during the release preparation >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and >>>>> >>>>>> while checking/voting for the release candidates. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Andreas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Fabian >>>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 >>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >>>>> >>>>> >>> -- >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received >>> this >>> email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately. >>> Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard >>> copy >>> by an authorised signatory. >>> >>> Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number >>> 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road, >>> London W6 7AN. >>> >> >> >> > > -- > > ------------------------------ > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this > email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately. > Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy > by an authorised signatory. > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road, > London W6 7AN. > -- ------------------------------ This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately. Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy by an authorised signatory. Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road, London W6 7AN.
