Hi all,

Replacing the CMS Adapter with Manifoldcf seams like a good Idea as it
seams that this whole Apache project aims to do similar things as this
Stanbol component.

Regarding the Fusepool ECS: Are there more information about the
features/architecture of this component? The demo shows that it does
support full text search and some kind of faceting, but it is hard to
see how similar/different it is in comparison with the current
Contenthub.

best
Rupert


On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com> wrote:
> Hi Reto,
>
> We once were thinking to develop another implementation of the CMS Adapter
> based on Apache Manifold (http://manifoldcf.apache.org/) for example using
> the CMIS Repository and Authority Connector and developing an Output
> Connector for Stanbol. I think that maybe that could be a more maintainable
> solution.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Regards
>
> El 21/10/13 14:13, Reto Bachmann-Gmür escribió:
>
>> Hi Rupert, all,
>>
>> I would envisage this for 1.0.0. But I'm not sure about ContentHub/CMS
>> Adapter. One hand there hasn't been any activity during the last 6 month
>> on
>> the other hand in the Fusepool project because of the limitation of having
>> the RDF metadata detached from the Solr index we have replaced it with ECS
>> (Backend) and Firstswim (GUI). The Fuseppol project would be excited to
>> contribute these back into Stanbol. For a demo see:
>> http://beta.fusepool.com/firstswim
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Reto
>>
>>
>> 1. https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-ecs
>> 2. https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-firstswim
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Rupert Westenthaler <
>> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I was considering to create Stanbol launchers without data bundles in
>>> the release branch. This would allow us to do a binary release.
>>>
>>> We could create launchers for
>>>
>>> * stateless (Enhancer & Entityhub)
>>> * semindexing (Stateless & Contenthub & CMS Adapter)
>>> * reasoning (Ontologymanager & Rules & Reasoning)
>>> * full (all stanbol modules)
>>>
>>> In addition we could include the Entityhub indexing tools as binary
>>> releases.
>>>
>>> WDYT
>>> Rupert
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@wymiwyg.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Fabian
>>>>
>>>> As we might need to build more release candidates I suggest to do this
>>>> in
>>>> the release branch. For the release plugin to work it will afaik be
>>>> necessary to adapt the svn url in the pom
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Reto
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Fabian Christ <
>>>
>>> christ.fab...@googlemail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> good to hear about the progress ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> I am currently checking that the trunk is fine when trying to build
>>>>> with the apache-release profile (this includes the RAT check). Once
>>>>> this succeeds we could create the release branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>   - Fabian
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/10/19 Andreas Kuckartz <a.kucka...@ping.de>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rupert Westenthaler:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However there is still no progress on the build issues of Andreas. As
>>>>>>> explained in [4] I can see in the log what is going wrong, but I have
>>>>>>> still no idea why this is happening in Andreas environment. All my
>>>>>>> tries to reproduce this where not successful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have executed and am executing more experiments with the integration
>>>>>> tests and will report today or tomorrow. I think that I observed
>>>>>> something during the start of the launcher which might or might not
>>>
>>> have
>>>>>>
>>>>>> something to do with the issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A good thing is that I have no problem reproducing the issues ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still I would suggest to close the trunk for new things ASAP. Release
>>>>>>> related bug fixes can still be done during the release preparation
>>>
>>> and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> while checking/voting for the release candidates.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Fabian
>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> | Rupert Westenthaler             rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11                             ++43-699-11108907
>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>
>
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------
> This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this
> email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
> Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy
> by an authorised signatory.
>
> Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number
> 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road,
> London W6 7AN.



-- 
| Rupert Westenthaler             rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11                             ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen

Reply via email to