Hi Reto, all what is the plan for the contenthub/ and cmsadapter/ in the trunk. I have noticed that they are missing in the new trunk.
best Rupert On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Antonio David Perez Morales <ape...@zaizi.com> wrote: > Hi All > > +1 to use Manifold to replace CMS Adapter of Stanbol. Moreover using > Manifold we can keep the right permission of documents in Stanbol for each > user. > > I have used Manifold and implemented/modified some connectors so I could > help in this task if everyone agrees. > > Regards > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com> wrote: > >> So, if you all think it is a good idea, I will create an issue to start >> working on it. >> >> +1 about Fusepool ECS. I have check its Github entry but would be fine to >> have more details in order to know the differences with ContentHub. >> >> Cheers, >> Rafa >> >> El 21/10/13 15:37, Rupert Westenthaler escribió: >> >> Hi all, >>> >>> Replacing the CMS Adapter with Manifoldcf seams like a good Idea as it >>> seams that this whole Apache project aims to do similar things as this >>> Stanbol component. >>> >>> Regarding the Fusepool ECS: Are there more information about the >>> features/architecture of this component? The demo shows that it does >>> support full text search and some kind of faceting, but it is hard to >>> see how similar/different it is in comparison with the current >>> Contenthub. >>> >>> best >>> Rupert >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Reto, >>>> >>>> We once were thinking to develop another implementation of the CMS >>>> Adapter >>>> based on Apache Manifold (http://manifoldcf.apache.org/**) for example >>>> using >>>> the CMIS Repository and Authority Connector and developing an Output >>>> Connector for Stanbol. I think that maybe that could be a more >>>> maintainable >>>> solution. >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> El 21/10/13 14:13, Reto Bachmann-Gmür escribió: >>>> >>>> Hi Rupert, all, >>>>> >>>>> I would envisage this for 1.0.0. But I'm not sure about ContentHub/CMS >>>>> Adapter. One hand there hasn't been any activity during the last 6 month >>>>> on >>>>> the other hand in the Fusepool project because of the limitation of >>>>> having >>>>> the RDF metadata detached from the Solr index we have replaced it with >>>>> ECS >>>>> (Backend) and Firstswim (GUI). The Fuseppol project would be excited to >>>>> contribute these back into Stanbol. For a demo see: >>>>> http://beta.fusepool.com/**firstswim<http://beta.fusepool.com/firstswim> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Reto >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 1. >>>>> https://github.com/fusepool/**fusepool-ecs<https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-ecs> >>>>> 2. >>>>> https://github.com/fusepool/**fusepool-firstswim<https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-firstswim> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Rupert Westenthaler < >>>>> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I was considering to create Stanbol launchers without data bundles in >>>>>> the release branch. This would allow us to do a binary release. >>>>>> >>>>>> We could create launchers for >>>>>> >>>>>> * stateless (Enhancer & Entityhub) >>>>>> * semindexing (Stateless & Contenthub & CMS Adapter) >>>>>> * reasoning (Ontologymanager & Rules & Reasoning) >>>>>> * full (all stanbol modules) >>>>>> >>>>>> In addition we could include the Entityhub indexing tools as binary >>>>>> releases. >>>>>> >>>>>> WDYT >>>>>> Rupert >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@wymiwyg.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Fabian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As we might need to build more release candidates I suggest to do this >>>>>>> in >>>>>>> the release branch. For the release plugin to work it will afaik be >>>>>>> necessary to adapt the svn url in the pom >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Reto >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Fabian Christ < >>>>>>> >>>>>> christ.fab...@googlemail.com >>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> good to hear about the progress ;) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am currently checking that the trunk is fine when trying to build >>>>>>>> with the apache-release profile (this includes the RAT check). Once >>>>>>>> this succeeds we could create the release branch. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> - Fabian >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2013/10/19 Andreas Kuckartz <a.kucka...@ping.de>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rupert Westenthaler: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> However there is still no progress on the build issues of Andreas. >>>>>>>>>> As >>>>>>>>>> explained in [4] I can see in the log what is going wrong, but I >>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>> still no idea why this is happening in Andreas environment. All my >>>>>>>>>> tries to reproduce this where not successful. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have executed and am executing more experiments with the >>>>>>>>> integration >>>>>>>>> tests and will report today or tomorrow. I think that I observed >>>>>>>>> something during the start of the launcher which might or might not >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> have >>>>>> >>>>>>> something to do with the issues. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A good thing is that I have no problem reproducing the issues ;-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Still I would suggest to close the trunk for new things ASAP. >>>>>>>>>> Release >>>>>>>>>> related bug fixes can still be done during the release preparation >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>> >>>>>>> while checking/voting for the release candidates. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Andreas >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Fabian >>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 >>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received >>>> this >>>> email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately. >>>> Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard >>>> copy >>>> by an authorised signatory. >>>> >>>> Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number >>>> 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road, >>>> London W6 7AN. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> ------------------------------ >> This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this >> email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately. >> Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy >> by an authorised signatory. >> >> Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number >> 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road, >> London W6 7AN. >> > > -- > > ------------------------------ > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this > email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately. > Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy > by an authorised signatory. > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road, > London W6 7AN. -- | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 | A-5500 Bischofshofen
