Hi Rafa Manifold sounds interesting. I do not see JCR in the list of supported connectors however.
But yes, ECS has currently no connector for external content-repositories. Cheers, Reto On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com> wrote: > Hi Reto, > > We once were thinking to develop another implementation of the CMS Adapter > based on Apache Manifold (http://manifoldcf.apache.org/**) for example > using the CMIS Repository and Authority Connector and developing an Output > Connector for Stanbol. I think that maybe that could be a more maintainable > solution. > > WDYT? > > Regards > > El 21/10/13 14:13, Reto Bachmann-Gmür escribió: > > Hi Rupert, all, >> >> I would envisage this for 1.0.0. But I'm not sure about ContentHub/CMS >> Adapter. One hand there hasn't been any activity during the last 6 month >> on >> the other hand in the Fusepool project because of the limitation of having >> the RDF metadata detached from the Solr index we have replaced it with ECS >> (Backend) and Firstswim (GUI). The Fuseppol project would be excited to >> contribute these back into Stanbol. For a demo see: >> http://beta.fusepool.com/**firstswim <http://beta.fusepool.com/firstswim> >> >> Cheers, >> Reto >> >> >> 1. >> https://github.com/fusepool/**fusepool-ecs<https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-ecs> >> 2. >> https://github.com/fusepool/**fusepool-firstswim<https://github.com/fusepool/fusepool-firstswim> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Rupert Westenthaler < >> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >>> >>> I was considering to create Stanbol launchers without data bundles in >>> the release branch. This would allow us to do a binary release. >>> >>> We could create launchers for >>> >>> * stateless (Enhancer & Entityhub) >>> * semindexing (Stateless & Contenthub & CMS Adapter) >>> * reasoning (Ontologymanager & Rules & Reasoning) >>> * full (all stanbol modules) >>> >>> In addition we could include the Entityhub indexing tools as binary >>> releases. >>> >>> WDYT >>> Rupert >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@wymiwyg.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Fabian >>>> >>>> As we might need to build more release candidates I suggest to do this >>>> in >>>> the release branch. For the release plugin to work it will afaik be >>>> necessary to adapt the svn url in the pom >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Reto >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Fabian Christ < >>>> >>> christ.fab...@googlemail.com >>> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> good to hear about the progress ;) >>>>> >>>>> I am currently checking that the trunk is fine when trying to build >>>>> with the apache-release profile (this includes the RAT check). Once >>>>> this succeeds we could create the release branch. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> - Fabian >>>>> >>>>> 2013/10/19 Andreas Kuckartz <a.kucka...@ping.de>: >>>>> >>>>>> Rupert Westenthaler: >>>>>> >>>>>>> However there is still no progress on the build issues of Andreas. As >>>>>>> explained in [4] I can see in the log what is going wrong, but I have >>>>>>> still no idea why this is happening in Andreas environment. All my >>>>>>> tries to reproduce this where not successful. >>>>>>> >>>>>> I have executed and am executing more experiments with the integration >>>>>> tests and will report today or tomorrow. I think that I observed >>>>>> something during the start of the launcher which might or might not >>>>>> >>>>> have >>> >>>> something to do with the issues. >>>>>> >>>>>> A good thing is that I have no problem reproducing the issues ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Still I would suggest to close the trunk for new things ASAP. Release >>>>>>> related bug fixes can still be done during the release preparation >>>>>>> >>>>>> and >>> >>>> while checking/voting for the release candidates. >>>>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Andreas >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Fabian >>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 >>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >>> >>> > > -- > > ------------------------------ > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this > email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately. > Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy > by an authorised signatory. > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road, > London W6 7AN.
