[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15137542#comment-15137542
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1226:
---------------------------------------

Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1074#discussion_r52214520
  
    --- Diff: 
storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/serialization/SerializationFactory.java ---
    @@ -141,7 +141,8 @@ public IdDictionary(StormTopology topology) {
                     ComponentCommon common = 
Utils.getComponentCommon(topology, name);
                     List<String> streams = new 
ArrayList<>(common.get_streams().keySet());
                     streamNametoId.put(name, idify(streams));
    -                streamIdToName.put(name, 
Utils.reverseMap(streamNametoId.get(name)));
    +                //TODO: Can the call to simpleReverseMap be replaced wih 
Utils.reverseMap ?
    --- End diff --
    
    Don't know either delete this message or replace the call.


> Port backtype.storm.util to java
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-1226
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1226
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: storm-core
>            Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
>            Assignee: Reza Farivar
>              Labels: java-migration, jstorm-merger
>
> Port backtype.storm.util from clojure to java.  In as many instances as 
> possible the same interface should be maintained, and calls to clojure 
> functions in the rest of the code should be replaces with calls to the 
> corresponding java code.
> Some similar functions can be found at  
> https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/jstorm-import/jstorm-core/src/main/java/com/alibaba/jstorm/utils/JStormUtils.java
> Although they are not identical.
> For function callbacks we may need to evaluate adding in appropriate callback 
> interfaces instead.  Please try to avoid using clojure internal java classes 
> unless necessary.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to