On 11/2/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I started to do that, but the idea was to also include the new > subprojects, like Scripting and Flow and Faces, which would start at a > 1.0.0 release. It seemed consistant to start with 1.0.0.
I missed the decision to include BSF, Flow and Faces. I don't think they belong in this distribution-- they have declared dependencies on Struts 1.2.7 and prior. But I still think I'm working on Struts 1.3, so see below. :) > And, it's *VERY* important that people realize that Struts Core > LIbrary is *not* a product, it's a distribution of products, like a > Linux distribution. That was already becoming a problem with the > Struts Classic moniker. After five years, the concept of Struts as a product is not going to go away so easily. Whether we call it 'Classic' or 'Core Library' or something else, I really think it needs to have 1.3 in the name and contain the 1.3.x versions of the sub-projects that make up what people think of as "Struts" (plus any new additions that come along.) What about versioning as 1.3_01 and just sequentially number them as 'builds' of Struts Core Library 1.3? As Craig mentioned, we're stating that this particular combination of sub-project versions is known to work together. -- Wendy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
