What about this. Struts 1.3.0 Distro - struts-core-1.3.0 - struts-taglib-1.3.0 - struts-tiles-1.3.0 - struts-el-1.3.0 - struts-apps-1.3.0 - struts-site-1.3.0 - struts-extras-1.3.0
Subprojects can have their own independent release numbers all being 1.3.0.x, with the "1.3.0" dictated by struts-core. Once we release struts-core-1.3.1, the other subprojects jump to 1.3.1. This way it's always clear which distro a none-core subproject release works with. (i.e. you can't be sure about using taglib-1.3.1.2 with core-1.3.0, but you're sure that taglib-1.3.0.4 will work) Subprojects that get added to the main distro assume the same versioning rules. Come to think of it, we could start BSF and scripting as 1.2.7.0 if they depend on 1.2.7. This way they'd start off with the same rules already, and everyone'll know you can use them with 1.2.7. In any case, I'm glad we're getting rid of "Classic". Hubert On 11/3/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/2/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I started to do that, but the idea was to also include the new > > subprojects, like Scripting and Flow and Faces, which would start at a > > 1.0.0 release. It seemed consistant to start with 1.0.0. > > I missed the decision to include BSF, Flow and Faces. I don't think > they belong in this distribution-- they have declared dependencies on > Struts 1.2.7 and prior. > > But I still think I'm working on Struts 1.3, so see below. :) > > > And, it's *VERY* important that people realize that Struts Core > > LIbrary is *not* a product, it's a distribution of products, like a > > Linux distribution. That was already becoming a problem with the > > Struts Classic moniker. > > After five years, the concept of Struts as a product is not going to > go away so easily. > > Whether we call it 'Classic' or 'Core Library' or something else, I > really think it needs to have 1.3 in the name and contain the 1.3.x > versions of the sub-projects that make up what people think of as > "Struts" (plus any new additions that come along.) > > What about versioning as 1.3_01 and just sequentially number them as > 'builds' of Struts Core Library 1.3? As Craig mentioned, we're > stating that this particular combination of sub-project versions is > known to work together. > > -- > Wendy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
