On 11/3/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > After five years, the concept of Struts as a product is not going to > go away so easily. > > Whether we call it 'Classic' or 'Core Library' or something else, I > really think it needs to have 1.3 in the name and contain the 1.3.x > versions of the sub-projects that make up what people think of as > "Struts" (plus any new additions that come along.) > > What about versioning as 1.3_01 and just sequentially number them as > 'builds' of Struts Core Library 1.3? As Craig mentioned, we're > stating that this particular combination of sub-project versions is > known to work together.
Personally I prefer the "classic" name. Whatever we choose to label it though, I think using "core" to label a download that includes several sub-projects is going to create confusion with the "core" sub-project. Also I agree with Wendy/Craig about version numbers - we need them for any download and I think not having them or using dates is a bad idea. Niall --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
