On 11/3/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11/3/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Or, we could just forget the whole thing and have only the individual
> > subproject releases. The bundle isn't mission critical; it was only
> > meant as a convenience.
>
> Bundle is critical, it ensures communication between teams ("Works for
> me... Which version do you use?") and forces subprojects authors to
> retest/recompile subprojects for each new bundle release to ensure
> compatibility with core and other subprojects.+1. Also, regarding the possible addition of extra submodules (struts-faces, BSF, etc.) ... it would make sense to include everything that works compatibly with the current 1.x core, but not until those submodules have had a standalone GA release of their own. It doesn't make sense to include Shale or Ti, however, because they are quite different (and will have their own constellations of modules to be packaged or not).. Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
