Hi Matt, > Is there a repo/artifactId/groupId I can use to start testing this. Ted just pointed this out to me. :-) Its at http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.x/
> Is there any documentation of "what's changed" in order to upgrade > from WebWork 2.2 to Struts 2.0? Ted wrote up somthing about this at http://confluence.twdata.org/display/WW/Release+Notes+2.0.0 hth ----- Original Message ---- From: Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> Sent: Monday, 24 July, 2006 8:15:45 AM Subject: Re: [s2] Struts 2.0.0 - Tag it and Roll it? Is there a repo/artifactId/groupId I can use to start testing this. Is there any documentation of "what's changed" in order to upgrade from WebWork 2.2 to Struts 2.0? If you can give me a simple start, I can try to create a more detailed set of instructions. Matt On 7/23/06, David Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I've downloaded the struts-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT-all.zip and had a look at its > contents. I'm wondering what the relationship is between this > struts-2.0.0 and the API published here: > http://www.crazybob.org/javadoc/ > > Is the crazybob version, or something like it, to become struts 2.0.1, > or some such? > > dave > > > On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 11:24 -0400, Ted Husted wrote: > > While we resolve the issues[1] involved in creating an automated Maven > > build for S2, I'd like to push forward and tag STRUTS_2_0_0. > > > > AFAIK, the API is stable. We just need to mop up some infrastructure > > issues. Tagging a revision will give early adopters a base starting > > point, especially since we do not have reliable nightly builds yet. > > > > I've fabricated a reasonable facsimile of a distribution > > > > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.x/ > > > > The distribution not perfect, since it lacks a snapshot of the > > documentation and the Struts2/Xwork2 apidocs are not integrated, but I > > believe, as a tagged build, it is still useful, especially since we > > continue to have troubles with the nightly builds. > > > > If we can get the usual majority consensus (3 +1s, more +1s than -1s), > > I'll tag and roll the trunk, and we can continue development with > > 2.0.1. > > > > Here's my +1 for tagging the Struts 2 trunk for STRUTS_2_0_0 as an > > "early adopters" build. > > > > -Ted. > > > > > > [1] > > > > Maven Build Issues > > > > * Integrated JavaDocs > > * TLD generatation > > * Wiki snapshot > > > > Other critical issues > > * Shopping cart throws HTTP 500 > > * Portlet docs refer to an Ant build > > > > All TODO > > * > > https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=10681 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
