[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13552885#comment-13552885 ]
Francesco Chicchiriccò commented on SYNCOPE-241: ------------------------------------------------ Christian, if you are absolutely sure that there is no better solution for the moment... > Move persistence and persistence impl into separate modules > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SYNCOPE-241 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-241 > Project: Syncope > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core > Affects Versions: 1.0.3-incubating > Reporter: Christian Schneider > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > Attachments: SYNCOPE-241-2.patch, SYNCOPE-241-3.patch, > SYNCOPE-241-4.patch, SYNCOPE-241-5.patch, SYNCOPE-241.patch > > > The core module currently contains many parts of syncope. This makes it > bigger and more complex than necessary. > A possible modularization is to move the internal model > (org.apache.syncope.core.persistence*) and the persistence impl > (org.apache.syncope.core.persistence.impl) out of core and into separate > modules. > One big advantage would be that the jpa code enhancements would then run in > the model module only. Currently we run into some problems in the cxf > migration when running the rest itests in core that may be caused by eclipse > overwriting the enhanced classes with plain classes. If the model > (peristence) classes are in a separate module we could leave it out of > eclipse and so this would be no issue anymore. > Another advantage would be that the persistence tests could run in the > persistence impl module so when working on the core they would not have to > run each time. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira