The RTC approach has worked successfully for a lot of projects. Also rolling back code in CTR seems like an overall painful process. RTC ensures that clean + signed off code is checked-in. +1 for RTC.
- Roshan On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Before we start the project in Apache process, we need to discuss dev > process. > > Two dev processes ( > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#ReviewThenCommit) seem to > be > used in apache projects. As far as I know, most of Apache projects follow > review then commit (RTC) instead of commit then review (CTR). In my > opinion, it would be good to follow the convention. > > Which one is better? Any suggestion? > > Thanks, > Hyunsik >
