I like the RTC but I believe we should not be too strict about it in the early phase of incubating project.
We need to get Tajo into easy to contribute stage with good documentations and good build scripts/tools. I would say we use RTC with common sense. If you are in doubt fire JIRA + review. Especially when half of the team are split between day and night =) Once the project is a bit stable then we could implement the strict RTC process. - Henry On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Before we start the project in Apache process, we need to discuss dev > process. > > Two dev processes ( > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#ReviewThenCommit) seem to > be > used in apache projects. As far as I know, most of Apache projects follow > review then commit (RTC) instead of commit then review (CTR). In my > opinion, it would be good to follow the convention. > > Which one is better? Any suggestion? > > Thanks, > Hyunsik >
