I agree to follow the convention too. +1 for RTC Regards, Yi Liu
-----Original Message----- From: Hyunsik Choi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 4:06 PM To: tajo-dev Subject: Re: a discussion of dev process Hi Chris, Thank you for your advice. As you mentioned, It would be good to pick dev process from consensus. +1 for RTC On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Hyunsik, > > I've had the opposite experience, most that I participate in are CTR. > So it's really just up to you guys how you want to do it. Either way > is fine. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > On 3/18/13 11:03 PM, "Hyunsik Choi" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >Before we start the project in Apache process, we need to discuss dev > >process. > > > >Two dev processes ( > >http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#ReviewThenCommit) seem > >to be used in apache projects. As far as I know, most of Apache > >projects follow review then commit (RTC) instead of commit then > >review (CTR). In my opinion, it would be good to follow the > >convention. > > > >Which one is better? Any suggestion? > > > >Thanks, > >Hyunsik > >
