I agree to follow the convention. +1 for RTC. 2013/3/19 Jihoon Son <[email protected]>: > Hi, all > > I agree with Roshan, too. > +1 for RTC. > > Cheers, > Jihoon > > 2013/3/19 Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <[email protected]> > >> Hi Hyunsik, >> >> I've had the opposite experience, most that I participate in are CTR. >> So it's really just up to you guys how you want to do it. Either way is >> fine. >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> >> On 3/18/13 11:03 PM, "Hyunsik Choi" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >Hi all, >> > >> >Before we start the project in Apache process, we need to discuss dev >> >process. >> > >> >Two dev processes ( >> >http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#ReviewThenCommit) seem to >> >be >> >used in apache projects. As far as I know, most of Apache projects follow >> >review then commit (RTC) instead of commit then review (CTR). In my >> >opinion, it would be good to follow the convention. >> > >> >Which one is better? Any suggestion? >> > >> >Thanks, >> >Hyunsik >> >> > > > -- > Jihoon Son > > Database & Information Systems Group, > Prof. Yon Dohn Chung Lab. > Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, > Korea University > 1, 5-ga, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, > Seoul, 136-713, Republic of Korea > > Tel : +82-2-3290-3580 > E-mail : [email protected]
-- -Jinho
