Hello, They can still use the web services - just takes a little bit more effort since they have to find and configure them themselves. I guess this is what the biocat perspective brings to the table. I think it is safer to move it to extras for the time being rather than spending effort on chasing down the provenance of some files.
Cheers, Ian On 21 September 2016 at 15:49, Gale Naylor <ga...@noventussolutions.com> wrote: > If we don't release the BioCatalogue perspective as part of Taverna 3, is > there a way for users to continue using those BioCatalogue web services, or > do we lose that capability? > > Gale > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:56 AM alaninmcr <alanin...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > On 21/09/2016 13:26, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > I don't know how much the Biocatalogue perspective is used in Taverna > > > 2.5 - I know it can be very useful to find and use lots of web > > > services - so arguably it would be a bit of a loss. It also has lots > > > of code to replicate in Java Swing what is also on the > > > biocatalogue.org website - that is perhaps not as needed. > > > > My long-standing opinion is that Taverna should not attempt to replicate > > a website, whether biocatalogue or myExperiment :) > > > > > What's your take? > > > > I agree with moving it out to extras. > > > > Alan > > > > >
