Done - (but using git rm instead of git subtree) Now moved out to:
https://github.com/taverna-extras/taverna-perspective-biocatalogue I changed the package name and groupId to io.github.tavernaextras.biocatalogue just in case. I also removed anything biocatalogue from taverna-workbench/NOTICE Thanks for the help, everyone! On 21 September 2016 at 23:17, Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, let's do it then. > > I'll export it with git sub-tree to keep history; and then we can > always import it later as it would still be (generally) Apache > licensed. > > > > On 21 September 2016 at 16:22, Gale Naylor <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Thanks for clarifying. We can include the Taverna 3 process for using the >> web services in our documentation (helping with backward-compatibility). >> >> I also agree with moving it for now. >> >> Gale >> >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:09 AM Thilina Manamgoda <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think that's a good idea. We can fix those license issue seperatly and >>> bring it back. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Thilina >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Ian Dunlop <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > Hello, >>> > >>> > They can still use the web services - just takes a little bit more effort >>> > since they have to find and configure them themselves. I guess this is >>> what >>> > the biocat perspective brings to the table. I think it is safer to move >>> it >>> > to extras for the time being rather than spending effort on chasing down >>> > the provenance of some files. >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > >>> > Ian >>> > >>> > On 21 September 2016 at 15:49, Gale Naylor <[email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > If we don't release the BioCatalogue perspective as part of Taverna 3, >>> is >>> > > there a way for users to continue using those BioCatalogue web >>> services, >>> > or >>> > > do we lose that capability? >>> > > >>> > > Gale >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:56 AM alaninmcr <[email protected]> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > On 21/09/2016 13:26, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >>> > > > [snip] >>> > > > >>> > > > > I don't know how much the Biocatalogue perspective is used in >>> Taverna >>> > > > > 2.5 - I know it can be very useful to find and use lots of web >>> > > > > services - so arguably it would be a bit of a loss. It also has >>> lots >>> > > > > of code to replicate in Java Swing what is also on the >>> > > > > biocatalogue.org website - that is perhaps not as needed. >>> > > > >>> > > > My long-standing opinion is that Taverna should not attempt to >>> > replicate >>> > > > a website, whether biocatalogue or myExperiment :) >>> > > > >>> > > > > What's your take? >>> > > > >>> > > > I agree with moving it out to extras. >>> > > > >>> > > > Alan >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
