Hi,

I think  that's a good idea. We can fix those license issue seperatly and
bring it back.

Thanks,
Thilina


On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Ian Dunlop <ianwdun...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> They can still use the web services - just takes a little bit more effort
> since they have to find and configure them themselves. I guess this is what
> the biocat perspective brings to the table. I think it is safer to move it
> to extras for the time being rather than spending effort on chasing down
> the provenance of some files.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> On 21 September 2016 at 15:49, Gale Naylor <ga...@noventussolutions.com>
> wrote:
>
> > If we don't release the BioCatalogue perspective as part of Taverna 3, is
> > there a way for users to continue using those BioCatalogue web services,
> or
> > do we lose that capability?
> >
> > Gale
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:56 AM alaninmcr <alanin...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 21/09/2016 13:26, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > I don't know how much the Biocatalogue perspective is used in Taverna
> > > > 2.5 - I know it can be very useful to find and use lots of web
> > > > services - so arguably it would be a bit of a loss. It also has lots
> > > > of code to replicate in Java Swing what is also on the
> > > > biocatalogue.org website - that is perhaps not as needed.
> > >
> > > My long-standing opinion is that Taverna should not attempt to
> replicate
> > > a website, whether biocatalogue or myExperiment :)
> > >
> > > > What's your take?
> > >
> > > I agree with moving it out to extras.
> > >
> > > Alan
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to