Thanks for clarifying. We can include the Taverna 3 process for using the web services in our documentation (helping with backward-compatibility).
I also agree with moving it for now. Gale On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:09 AM Thilina Manamgoda <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I think that's a good idea. We can fix those license issue seperatly and > bring it back. > > Thanks, > Thilina > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Ian Dunlop <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > They can still use the web services - just takes a little bit more effort > > since they have to find and configure them themselves. I guess this is > what > > the biocat perspective brings to the table. I think it is safer to move > it > > to extras for the time being rather than spending effort on chasing down > > the provenance of some files. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Ian > > > > On 21 September 2016 at 15:49, Gale Naylor <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > If we don't release the BioCatalogue perspective as part of Taverna 3, > is > > > there a way for users to continue using those BioCatalogue web > services, > > or > > > do we lose that capability? > > > > > > Gale > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:56 AM alaninmcr <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On 21/09/2016 13:26, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > > I don't know how much the Biocatalogue perspective is used in > Taverna > > > > > 2.5 - I know it can be very useful to find and use lots of web > > > > > services - so arguably it would be a bit of a loss. It also has > lots > > > > > of code to replicate in Java Swing what is also on the > > > > > biocatalogue.org website - that is perhaps not as needed. > > > > > > > > My long-standing opinion is that Taverna should not attempt to > > replicate > > > > a website, whether biocatalogue or myExperiment :) > > > > > > > > > What's your take? > > > > > > > > I agree with moving it out to extras. > > > > > > > > Alan > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
