On 21 January 2014 21:18, Rémy Maucherat <r...@apache.org> wrote: > 2014/1/21 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> > >> On the down side: >> - there is much more potential to mess things up >> > > Yes, I can help with that if you want :) > > >> - cleaning up is potentially more complex >> - the disruption of the move - particularly if we want to move to a >> single git repo - could be significant >> >> >> Thoughts? >>
Very good idea! > > Risky, but it can be attempted. I'm not very familiar with the > infrastructure used though. git.apache.org is there already, it mirrors > svn, and it is then mirrored again in github ? The repo to do the commits > would then be git.apache.org ? > > Since we're considering big changes, what about Maven too ? I'll spare you > the pros and cons. I wonder if this could improve a bit the modularity of the various jars we deploy. Especially for the embeded part. (maybe could prevent issues as: jsp/jasper is mandatory to run embeded mode even if you don't use it) > > Rémy -- Olivier Lamy Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
