On 2018/02/13 09:15:54, Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: 
> I'll create the tickets for infra so we have the repos ready.
> 

No infra ticket required.  Git repos are fully self serve:

git-wip-us hosted repos are requested via https://selfserve.apache.org/
gitbox hosted repos are requested via 
https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/newrepo.html

> Can you look at the other steps?
> I'm not very familiar with the steps in case of code donation. So I'll need
> to document myself as well.
> 
> Le 13 févr. 2018 10:10, "Thiago Veronezi" <thi...@veronezi.org> a écrit :
> 
> > Awesome!
> >
> > Thanks guys.
> >
> > Thanks Jean-Louis for sort this out that fast! Count me in for the
> > incubator work.
> >
> > []s,
> > Thiago.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 7:08 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Thiago.
> > >
> > > I have done all the change and prepared the donation. It needs some
> > > paperwork for IP clearance.
> > >
> > > I have followed the option where we have each in its own repo instead of
> > > the current TomEE repo. It appeared to be more flexible to me bit happy
> > to
> > > change if the community thinks it's better.
> > >
> > > If you can help with incubator and paperwork I have the 2 projects ready
> > > for review.
> > >
> > > Le 13 févr. 2018 10:00, "Thiago Veronezi" <thi...@veronezi.org> a écrit
> > :
> > >
> > > > Hi guys,
> > > >
> > > > I have some use for Chatterbox and I would like to contribute.
> > > >
> > > > Sheldon and Chatterbox are examples of awesome use of stack Java EE
> > JCA,
> > > > aren't they?
> > > >
> > > > What about creating a module "resource-adapters" and having these guys
> > > > there?
> > > >
> > > > <groupId>com.apache.tomee.rars</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>chatterbox</artifactId>
> > > >
> > > > <groupId>com.apache.tomee.rars</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>sheldon</artifactId>
> > > >
> > > > We would have them available for download on tomee.apache.org and
> > maven
> > > > central without going through yet another project configuration.
> > > >
> > > > If these guys grow so much that they require to be split into their own
> > > top
> > > > project, we can do that later.
> > > >
> > > > []s,
> > > > Thiago.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 3:15 PM, Mark Struberg
> > <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for a new github repo and 1 per project.
> > > > > And we still need a name for this 'aggregator'.
> > > > > In Myfaces it was myfaces-ext-*But if you did your history lections
> > > then
> > > > > you would have noticed that keeping myfaces in the name was NOT a
> > good
> > > > > idea.While CODI (myfaces-ext-cdi) did also run perfectly fine on
> > > Mojarra
> > > > we
> > > > > had a really huge acceptance problem. This later lead us to join
> > forces
> > > > > with Seam and merge together to Apache DeltaSpike - just to remove
> > any
> > > > > doubt that it will only run with MyFaces.
> > > > > Now if we would name it tomee-sheldon then it would most likely be
> > > > exactly
> > > > > the same.
> > > > > So please propose a good name which makes it clear that this does not
> > > > > belong to TomEE the app server but is just a modular part which is
> > > > > portable. Or go the other route: make it really TomEE specific. In
> > any
> > > > case
> > > > > we must be sure which route we want to take.
> > > > > LieGrue,strub
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >     On Monday, 5 February 2018, 15:06:23 CET, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >  One per project
> > > > >
> > > > > And no need of tomee in the name ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > we already have tomee.git so we can get sheldon.git and
> > chatterbox.git
> > > > >
> > > > > 2018-02-05 14:38 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
> > > > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm fine either way, do we want one per sub-project/sub-tool or one
> > > > with
> > > > > > everything inside?
> > > > > > If we go this path I'm tempted to say, one per contribution.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That would make
> > > > > > tomee git repo
> > > > > > tomee-sheldon git repo
> > > > > > tomee-chatterbox git repo
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jean-Louis
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > just plain new git repos IMHO
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> > > > > > > rmannibucau> |
> > > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > > > > > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-
> > > > > > > ee-8-high-performance>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2018-02-05 14:21 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > > > > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
> > > > > > >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In terms of source code, do we want something like this
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > tomee/ (the main git project)
> > > > > > > > ..tomee-server/ --> no idea what name would be the best from a
> > > user
> > > > > > > > perspective
> > > > > > > > ..sheldon/
> > > > > > > > ..chatterbox/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > WDYT?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > > > > > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Excellent. Happy to help with the process in any way I can.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Jon
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > > > > > > > > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Looks like David is busy, so I'll close the VOTE for him
> > and
> > > > > > proceed.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The VOTE passes with
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1: John D. Ament, Jonathan Gallimore, Mark Struberg, Andy
> > > > > > Gumbrecht,
> > > > > > > > > David
> > > > > > > > > > Blevins and Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > No 0 and no -1
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > non-binding +1: Matthew Broadhead, Elder Moraes
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for voting
> > > > > > > > > > Jean-Louis
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > > > > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:52 AM, John D. Ament <
> > > > > > johndam...@apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Did you tally?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I have an internal ASF use case for chatterbox that I'd
> > > like
> > > > to
> > > > > > > > figure
> > > > > > > > > > out
> > > > > > > > > > > the next steps on.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > John
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 3:21 PM David Blevins <
> > > > > > > > david.blev...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > My +1
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ... will tally shortly.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > David Blevins
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 8, 2017, at 2:24 PM, David Blevins <
> > > > > > > > david.blev...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Let’s put this up for a vote.  Proposal:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Should we accept the code donations of Sheldon and
> > > > > Chatterbox
> > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > part
> > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > the Apache TomEE project.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >  - https://tomitribe.io/projects/sheldon <
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://tomitribe.io/projects/sheldon>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >  - https://tomitribe.io/projects/chatterbox <
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://tomitribe.io/projects/chatterbox>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > They’ll be named Apache Sheldon and Apache 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Chatterbox
> > > > > > > > respectively.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Maven groupid and java packages up for discussion.  (I
> > > have
> > > > > no
> > > > > > > > > > > preference)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > All votes welcome:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >  +1: Let’s do this!
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +0: I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with
> > > > this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -0: I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't
> > do
> > > > > this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -1: I really don't like this, because [insert reason]
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I’ll leave this up for a week so people have time to
> > > > vote.
> > > > > > All
> > > > > > > > > votes
> > > > > > > > > > > > are welcome from anyone.  The more votes the better.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > David Blevins
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://twitter.com/dblevins <
> > > http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 

Reply via email to