Yes, all the committers on those projects of course need to have an iCLA on file. And the PMC has to do an IP clearance. Once that's done it's fine to directly import it over here.
LieGrue, strub PS: at OWB it was a bit different: with Meecrowave it was basically moving parts which existed in OWB since the incubation in 2008 (OWB bundled with tomcat) to an own project because it has a different lifecycle. > Am 13.02.2018 um 10:47 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > Yes, this doesn't apply for *sub*projects. Karaf, OpenWebBeans, ... are > examples doing that without any issues. Also the fact the license - even if > not explicit with a LICENSE file but only headers - is asf v2 in all > projects helps to smooth that procedure. So public > donation+license+subproject = no need to go through headaches IMHO. > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > 2018-02-13 10:43 GMT+01:00 Thiago Veronezi <thi...@veronezi.org>: > >> Are you sure we don't need the incubator? I know that Tomcat has multiple >> github repositories, but they are simple mirrors of the same svn repository >> on different branches (tc7, tc8 etc). >> >> From https://incubator.apache.org/faq.html I get this... >> >> " >> 1.4. Someone has proposed that their code/project be donated to project X >> within the ASF for continued development. What do we need to do to accept >> the code? >> >> The Incubator will only accept code for incubation if a PMC has voted to >> accept it. So when a proposal for the donation of code occurs, the project >> in question should discuss the proposal (usually on their public mailing >> lists!), leading to a decision by that project’s PMC on whether or not to >> sponsor the code (and potentially the project surrounding it). If the PMC >> agrees, then the incubator can be approached, and the code accepted for >> incubation. The grant needs to be recorded by following the procedure >> outlined at the IP Clearance forms >> <https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/>. >> >> " >> >> We passed the point of vote. The code has been accepted. Once the IP forms >> are formalized, we may start the incubation process. >> >> []s, >> Thiago. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 7:29 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com >>> >> wrote: >> >>> side note: we don't need to go through asf@incubator here, the vote >> passed >>> and the project can be imported as soon as the repos are created by >> infra. >>> The only thing to take care (and a lot) is to make clear tomitribe gives >>> (donates) this code to asf. A public message on a list is generally good >>> and a commit done by a tomitribe member are enough in general. >>> >>> In other words: let just that happen :) >>> >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ >>> rmannibucau> | >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- >>> ee-8-high-performance> >>> >>> 2018-02-13 10:27 GMT+01:00 Thiago Veronezi <thi...@veronezi.org>: >>> >>>> Yes, looking at the steps now. I will ping you later for more guidance. >>> At >>>> first glance, It looks like a very complex process. It's a good >> learning >>>> opportunity. >>>> Thanks man. >>>> >>>> []s, >>>> Thiago >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 7:15 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < >>>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'll create the tickets for infra so we have the repos ready. >>>>> >>>>> Can you look at the other steps? >>>>> I'm not very familiar with the steps in case of code donation. So >> I'll >>>> need >>>>> to document myself as well. >>>>> >>>>> Le 13 févr. 2018 10:10, "Thiago Veronezi" <thi...@veronezi.org> a >>> écrit >>>> : >>>>> >>>>>> Awesome! >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks guys. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Jean-Louis for sort this out that fast! Count me in for the >>>>>> incubator work. >>>>>> >>>>>> []s, >>>>>> Thiago. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 7:08 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < >>>>>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey Thiago. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have done all the change and prepared the donation. It needs >> some >>>>>>> paperwork for IP clearance. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have followed the option where we have each in its own repo >>> instead >>>>> of >>>>>>> the current TomEE repo. It appeared to be more flexible to me bit >>>> happy >>>>>> to >>>>>>> change if the community thinks it's better. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you can help with incubator and paperwork I have the 2 >> projects >>>>> ready >>>>>>> for review. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le 13 févr. 2018 10:00, "Thiago Veronezi" <thi...@veronezi.org> >> a >>>>> écrit >>>>>> : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have some use for Chatterbox and I would like to contribute. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sheldon and Chatterbox are examples of awesome use of stack >> Java >>> EE >>>>>> JCA, >>>>>>>> aren't they? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What about creating a module "resource-adapters" and having >> these >>>>> guys >>>>>>>> there? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <groupId>com.apache.tomee.rars</groupId> >>>>>>>> <artifactId>chatterbox</artifactId> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <groupId>com.apache.tomee.rars</groupId> >>>>>>>> <artifactId>sheldon</artifactId> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We would have them available for download on tomee.apache.org >>> and >>>>>> maven >>>>>>>> central without going through yet another project >> configuration. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If these guys grow so much that they require to be split into >>> their >>>>> own >>>>>>> top >>>>>>>> project, we can do that later. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> []s, >>>>>>>> Thiago. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 3:15 PM, Mark Struberg >>>>>> <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 for a new github repo and 1 per project. >>>>>>>>> And we still need a name for this 'aggregator'. >>>>>>>>> In Myfaces it was myfaces-ext-*But if you did your history >>>> lections >>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>> you would have noticed that keeping myfaces in the name was >>> NOT a >>>>>> good >>>>>>>>> idea.While CODI (myfaces-ext-cdi) did also run perfectly fine >>> on >>>>>>> Mojarra >>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>> had a really huge acceptance problem. This later lead us to >>> join >>>>>> forces >>>>>>>>> with Seam and merge together to Apache DeltaSpike - just to >>>> remove >>>>>> any >>>>>>>>> doubt that it will only run with MyFaces. >>>>>>>>> Now if we would name it tomee-sheldon then it would most >> likely >>>> be >>>>>>>> exactly >>>>>>>>> the same. >>>>>>>>> So please propose a good name which makes it clear that this >>> does >>>>> not >>>>>>>>> belong to TomEE the app server but is just a modular part >> which >>>> is >>>>>>>>> portable. Or go the other route: make it really TomEE >> specific. >>>> In >>>>>> any >>>>>>>> case >>>>>>>>> we must be sure which route we want to take. >>>>>>>>> LieGrue,strub >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Monday, 5 February 2018, 15:06:23 CET, Romain >>> Manni-Bucau >>>> < >>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> One per project >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And no need of tomee in the name ;) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> we already have tomee.git so we can get sheldon.git and >>>>>> chatterbox.git >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2018-02-05 14:38 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro < >>>>>>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com >>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm fine either way, do we want one per >> sub-project/sub-tool >>> or >>>>> one >>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>> everything inside? >>>>>>>>>> If we go this path I'm tempted to say, one per >> contribution. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That would make >>>>>>>>>> tomee git repo >>>>>>>>>> tomee-sheldon git repo >>>>>>>>>> tomee-chatterbox git repo >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro >>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >>>>>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> just plain new git repos IMHO >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>> https://github.com/ >>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | >> Book >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- >>>>>>>>>>> ee-8-high-performance> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2018-02-05 14:21 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro < >>>>>>>>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com >>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In terms of source code, do we want something like this >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> tomee/ (the main git project) >>>>>>>>>>>> ..tomee-server/ --> no idea what name would be the best >>>> from >>>>> a >>>>>>> user >>>>>>>>>>>> perspective >>>>>>>>>>>> ..sheldon/ >>>>>>>>>>>> ..chatterbox/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro >>>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Jonathan Gallimore < >>>>>>>>>>>> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent. Happy to help with the process in any way >> I >>>> can. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < >>>>>>>>>>>>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like David is busy, so I'll close the VOTE >> for >>>> him >>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> proceed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The VOTE passes with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: John D. Ament, Jonathan Gallimore, Mark >> Struberg, >>>>> Andy >>>>>>>>>> Gumbrecht, >>>>>>>>>>>>> David >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blevins and Jean-Louis Monteiro >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No 0 and no -1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-binding +1: Matthew Broadhead, Elder Moraes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for voting >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:52 AM, John D. Ament < >>>>>>>>>> johndam...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you tally? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have an internal ASF use case for chatterbox >> that >>>> I'd >>>>>>> like >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> figure >>>>>>>>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the next steps on. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> John >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 3:21 PM David Blevins < >>>>>>>>>>>> david.blev...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... will tally shortly. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Blevins >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 8, 2017, at 2:24 PM, David Blevins < >>>>>>>>>>>> david.blev...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let’s put this up for a vote. Proposal: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should we accept the code donations of >> Sheldon >>>> and >>>>>>>>> Chatterbox >>>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>> part >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Apache TomEE project. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - https://tomitribe.io/projects/sheldon < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://tomitribe.io/projects/sheldon> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - https://tomitribe.io/projects/chatterbox >> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://tomitribe.io/projects/chatterbox> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They’ll be named Apache Sheldon and Apache >>>>> Chatterbox >>>>>>>>>>>> respectively. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maven groupid and java packages up for >>> discussion. >>>>> (I >>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>> no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preference) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All votes welcome: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Let’s do this! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +0: I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm >>> okay >>>>> with >>>>>>>> this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -0: I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we >>>>> didn't >>>>>> do >>>>>>>>> this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1: I really don't like this, because [insert >>>>> reason] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ll leave this up for a week so people have >>> time >>>>> to >>>>>>>> vote. >>>>>>>>>> All >>>>>>>>>>>>> votes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are welcome from anyone. The more votes the >>>> better. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Blevins >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins < >>>>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
