heh yea, just keep it going. But keep the idea of probably having something 
tomee independent in the back of your head please!
It's not that we need to go through incubator if we want to move things over to 
Geronimo later. But it would still be great to avoid duplications if possible.
> Jwt-auth impl doesnt depend on tomee and is reusable so must not be put in 
> tomee codebase
Being french I assume you don't mean 'must not' but rather 'doesn't need to' or 
rather 'should not', isn't?
Of course people _can_ put it into TomEE. It's just that it doesn't make the 
most sense from an ASF wide approach. That doesn't mean that it's not allowed.

LieGrue,strub

 

    On Monday, 19 March 2018, 21:46:17 CET, Andy Gumbrecht 
<[email protected]> wrote:  
 
 Totally agree Mark! So not sure where the issue lays if any? I just 
don't see a problem with accepting contributions and refactoring if 
required in order to get the ball rolling, rather than staring at the 
ball until becomes a cube, or waiting for it to be a perfect pyramid ;-)


On 19/03/18 17:03, Mark Struberg wrote:
>  
>    On Monday, 19 March 2018, 11:05:21 CET, Andy Gumbrecht 
><[email protected]> wrote:  > I don't see TomEE as the center of the 
>world, but somewhere where people
>> should be free to work without constantly being told it's not OK to do so.
> No, I didn't mean it that way. It's perfectly fine to do things in TomEE of 
> course. And again: TomEE IS important. But if we hit some CDI problem then we 
> should try to fix it 'upstream' in OpenWebBeans - and not in TomEE. And if we 
> hit JAX-RS issues then we should try to fix it in CXF - and not in TomEE. Got 
> me?
>
> You know that we had lots of duplication and hacks in TomEE to 'tweak' OWB. 
> And it did really hurt when the spec did evolve. We cleaned that up and the 
> code is now much easier to maintain.
> The thing I wanted to express is that the barriers for existing ASF commiters 
> are pretty low. If possible then we should fix things where they belong to. 
> Yes, sometimes it might be the easiest/quickest to just add a workaround in 
> TomEE. But often that is not the _correct_ way to do it. And in the long term 
> it adds maintenance costs.
>
> I have to admit that I did just roughly glimpsed over the JWT work, so I 
> cannot even judge whether the JWT part makes sense for Geronimo or not. Will 
> try to catch up in the next few days.
> LieGrue,strub
>
>    

-- 
Andy Gumbrecht
https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
http://www.tomitribe.com
https://www.tomitribe.io


Ubique

  

Reply via email to