2018-03-19 9:37 GMT+01:00 Andy Gumbrecht <agumbre...@tomitribe.com>:

> I think that if anyone feels like contributing to TomEE then we should
> allow and encourage that as soon as possible. The politics of where things
> should 'eventually' reside is a huge distraction and just serves to block
> any progress at the moment - The enthusiasm dies quickly after a week of
> back and forth. The first choice for anything should be TomEE, as that is
> the community we serve. The first response should be thank you, and we
> should accept the help offered. Then those that want to worry about
> extraction and reuse should feel free to go ahead and do that if they feel
> strongly enough about it. It should not be the priority for TomEE.
>

Well, this has been discussed N times and TomEE always has been the second
choice. I am particularly unhappy it keeps coming back until it is TomEE
which will just kill TomEE as a project IMHO and it kills the effort as
well.


>
> The goal should be to get TomEE on the MP board as soon as possible. If
> that initially means TomEE 8, Java 8, and accepting a few PRs then we
> should press ahead with that now. Anything that might need back-porting can
> be addressed later.
>

This is actually what is done and as showed with MP-Config it works very
well this way:
1. impl @G
2. integration @T (keep in mind tomee is an integration project and not an
impl project otherwise we need to absorb cxf, activemp, openjpa,
openwebbeans, batchee, johnzon, ...)

This allows to use the projects in any CDI based application without having
the drawback of being tomee dependent which is not required by any MP spec.



>
> Andy.
>
>
>
> On 19/03/18 01:02, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> On Mar 18, 2018, at 2:38 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Are you against/-1ing g-jwt-auth?
>>>
>> I wouldn't do that, but it's also clear to me the discussion in this
>> thread can be significantly clearer.  Objections were made that weren't
>> resolved.  The discussion started as what do "we" do with we meaning TomEE
>> and Geronimo.  At some point in the middle it was stated Geronimo has
>> already made a decision.  I also have the feeling people may have opinions
>> that are in-between a full TomEE vs Geronimo decision, such as wanting to
>> put work into inching closer to get a better view before deciding.
>>
>> I think all these things are fine, but we need some healthy votes so
>> people can move forward with clear support.
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Andy Gumbrecht
> https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> https://www.tomitribe.io
>
>
> Ubique
>
>

Reply via email to