I think that if anyone feels like contributing to TomEE then we should
allow and encourage that as soon as possible. The politics of where
things should 'eventually' reside is a huge distraction and just serves
to block any progress at the moment - The enthusiasm dies quickly after
a week of back and forth. The first choice for anything should be TomEE,
as that is the community we serve. The first response should be thank
you, and we should accept the help offered. Then those that want to
worry about extraction and reuse should feel free to go ahead and do
that if they feel strongly enough about it. It should not be the
priority for TomEE.
The goal should be to get TomEE on the MP board as soon as possible. If
that initially means TomEE 8, Java 8, and accepting a few PRs then we
should press ahead with that now. Anything that might need back-porting
can be addressed later.
Andy.
On 19/03/18 01:02, David Blevins wrote:
On Mar 18, 2018, at 2:38 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
Are you against/-1ing g-jwt-auth?
I wouldn't do that, but it's also clear to me the discussion in this thread can be
significantly clearer. Objections were made that weren't resolved. The discussion
started as what do "we" do with we meaning TomEE and Geronimo. At some point
in the middle it was stated Geronimo has already made a decision. I also have the
feeling people may have opinions that are in-between a full TomEE vs Geronimo decision,
such as wanting to put work into inching closer to get a better view before deciding.
I think all these things are fine, but we need some healthy votes so people can
move forward with clear support.
-David
--
Andy Gumbrecht
https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
http://www.tomitribe.com
https://www.tomitribe.io
Ubique
