I'd like to wrap this up so if you have other questions or would like to vote, now is the time. Reminder, you do not need to be a committer to vote.
-- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins http://www.tomitribe.com > On Mar 18, 2018, at 5:02 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The vote for merging PR 123 does not address community will on what to do > with the code beyond merging it. One can realistically vote +1 to merge the > code, but then desire to see the code cleaned up and moved elsewhere. One > can realistically desire seeing an attempt to clean up the code to find what > is reusable and may wish to withhold a final decision until we see how > fruitful such a module would be. > > Out of respect for people who may not know exactly how they feel (TomEE or > Geronimo), this is a vote for the latter. > > Vote: Should we attempt to extract code from the JWT PR to see what is > reusable and how successful such a jar would be? > > +1 Let's give it a shot here > +-0 > -1 Let's do this elsewhere > > If the vote is +1 to attempt an extraction of reusable code here, final > conclusion of if that extraction is worth it or where it should live is not > being voted on. People are welcome to decide differently based on the > results of the exercise. > > > -David >
