+1 Let's give it a shot here On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 2:12 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd like to wrap this up so if you have other questions or would like to > vote, now is the time. Reminder, you do not need to be a committer to vote. > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Mar 18, 2018, at 5:02 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > The vote for merging PR 123 does not address community will on what to > do with the code beyond merging it. One can realistically vote +1 to merge > the code, but then desire to see the code cleaned up and moved elsewhere. > One can realistically desire seeing an attempt to clean up the code to find > what is reusable and may wish to withhold a final decision until we see how > fruitful such a module would be. > > > > Out of respect for people who may not know exactly how they feel (TomEE > or Geronimo), this is a vote for the latter. > > > > Vote: Should we attempt to extract code from the JWT PR to see what is > reusable and how successful such a jar would be? > > > > +1 Let's give it a shot here > > +-0 > > -1 Let's do this elsewhere > > > > If the vote is +1 to attempt an extraction of reusable code here, final > conclusion of if that extraction is worth it or where it should live is not > being voted on. People are welcome to decide differently based on the > results of the exercise. > > > > > > -David > > > >
