My main issue is why the ATR objective is not to simply make it easier for projects to create dist/download artifacts that have been used successfully for years. I have seen no reason to rearchitect the entire process.
Craig > On Dec 18, 2025, at 07:53, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for that. > > Was there a discussion focused on why dist/downloads was not fit for task? > What are the reasons for migration to a new system instead of simply > integrating with the current system? > > Warm regards, > Craig > > >> On Dec 18, 2025, at 07:47, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> https://tooling.apache.org/svn-dist >> >> I recently figured out a way to use mermaid charts with pelican. The site >> needs more updates. We currently plan to reach transition 2b for beta. >> >> Best, >> Dave >> >>> On Dec 17, 2025, at 5:39 PM, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I've heard talk of the dist mechanism being replaced. I cannot find the >>> documentation on what the replacement might look like. >>> >>> This is part of a broader question about the high level architecture of the >>> ATR system. I've looked at the github repo as well as >>> https://tooling.apache.org/ and can't find anything. >>> >>> Craig >>> >>> Craig L Russell >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > Craig L Russell > [email protected] > Craig L Russell [email protected]
