> On Dec 18, 2025, at 18:02, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > > Because the svn-based solution is hitting operational snags. It MUST be > replaced. > > svn itself has no problem with a repository measured in dozens of > terabytes. But that totally blows up operational concerns.
Last I heard (and I do pay attention) svn is where the projects put their stuff. After that, infra makes dozens of copies and distributes them around the world and delivers them via dyn/closer and/or dlcdn. Svn does not have to scale. What did I miss? Feel free to share privately if this is secret stuff. Craig L Russell [email protected]
